Thursday, June 30, 2005

Redesign!

That's much better. Sure the links up top don't work quite yet, but they will soon! Also returning will be all of my papers, articles, opinion pieces, and apologetics material. It might take time, but it's coming along.

And just in case you'd like to know, we seem to be making a splash over at Commonwealth Conservative with regards to the Hawaii trips.

Glad to know I'm not the only one who sees this as a problem.

The Conceit of Government

The WSJ's Peggy Noonan asks the question as to why politicians seem so full of themselves, especially criticizing Senator Barrack Obama's comparison of himself to President Lincoln:
Oh. So that's what Lincoln's for. Actually Lincoln's life is a lot like Mr. Obama's. Lincoln came from a lean-to in the backwoods. His mother died when he was 9. The Lincolns had no money, no standing. Lincoln educated himself, reading law on his own, working as a field hand, a store clerk and a raft hand on the Mississippi. He also split some rails. He entered politics, knew more defeat than victory, and went on to lead the nation through its greatest trauma, the Civil War, and past its greatest sin, slavery.

Barack Obama, the son of two University of Hawaii students, went to Columbia and Harvard Law after attending a private academy that taught the children of the Hawaiian royal family. He made his name in politics as an aggressive Chicago vote hustler in Bill Clinton's first campaign for the presidency.

You see the similarities.
Frankly, it makes me wonder whether or not there's any room in politics anymore for the self-made Abe Lincoln's anymore.

Quite seriously, whom would you rather vote for? The poor, self-educated rail splitter? Or the Columbia and Harvard Law graduate?
What is in the air there in Washington, what is in the water?

What is wrong with them? This is not a rhetorical question. I think it is unspoken question No. 1 as Americans look at so many of the individuals in our government. What is wrong with them?
It's identity politics. People vote for the person they would like to identify with in office. I support Bush because he's strong on terrorism. I support Senator Allen because he upholds "Jeffersonian Conservative" principles. I support my supervisor because he's a great guy who listens to people.

We want to be reminded of their great, endearing qualities, because when they remind us of how great they are, we remind ourselves of our own presupposed qualities and how we projected them into these politicians.

Isn't this why Caesar thrice refused the crown? It's an old trick. Timeless even. But it works because people see themselves in the people they elect.

FLS: Officials heading to Hawaii

I made an issue of this during my campaign, and it was largely the excuse given when asked whether or not I was running a negative campaign. "All politicians go on trips, what's the big deal?"

The big deal is these trips aren't just trips. They're vacations bought and paid for by taxpayers. Yes yes, I know that some conferences are worth going to. But Hawaii?
Media inquiries have government officials from across the U.S. mainland defending their decisions to attend the conference. Some boards have even decided not to allow any of their members to attend.

"I certainly would not have had it in Honolulu if I had my choice, but unfortunately I don't get to choose the place," Taylor said.

Although some government officials have canceled their plans to fly to Hawaii courtesy of taxpayers, a NACO spokesperson says the turnout is expected to settle at about 3,000.
Now the excuse given is that Hawaii has the best rural road network in the nation. Gee. . . would that be because of (a) it's status as a group of islands, (b) its bustling tourist industry, or (c) it's sparkling white sands and beaches?

As for the cost of the trip to Hawaii, Caroline Supervisor Calvin Taylor has this to offer:
Supervisors said the county's road needs cost much more than a trip to Hawaii.

"You're not going to pave roads for $3,500," Taylor said.
And there's what angers me the most. Calvin, it's not your money to spend! It belongs to taxpayers, and when you're talking about tax increases for this and that, there's zero excuse for lawmakers to be trekking the world while raising taxes. Period.

I hope folks in the Port Royal District remember Taylor's trip to Hawaii in 2007. I will.

Missing something here...

This young man (19) killed his parents after spending £30,000 in credit cards. While he got life imprisonment, his charge was reduced to manslaughter. Why?
Blackwell admitted manslaughter with diminished responsibility. He suffers 'narcissistic personality disorder'.
Narcissistic personality disorder?

What?!

Just to make sure I'm not off my rocker, I went back and looked at both the European and American definitions. In short, the kid thinks he's better than everyone else.

Now I'm sure some folks might ask what the big deal is. My personal gripe is that we're treating this as some sort of clinical, scientific disease (a personality disorder?). "Spoiled" is the word my grandparents would have used. It's not a disease. The kid needed a good swift kick in the ass when he was growing up (another term my grandparents would have used - and applied).

My other complaint would be the classification process. It's not the person that's the problem -- the problem is this gobbledygook "personality disorder" that's troubling this person, as if it could be vivisected, isolated, and treated. I disagree to a large part, but of course that's the philosopher talking and not the well-trained psychologist who arrived at this disorder.

Wednesday, June 29, 2005

"Just Desserts Cafe"

I'm sorry... I know everyone else is commenting about Justice Souter's property in New Hampshire being confiscated in light of the 5-4 ruling against property rights, but I can't help but join the chorus:
The letter dubbing the project the 'Lost Liberty Hotel' was posted on conservative radio show host Rush Limbaugh's Web site. Clements said it would include a dining room called the 'Just Desserts Cafe' an a museum focused on the 'loss of freedom in America.'
The Just Desserts Cafe? Heh!

VDOT Dashboard

A good start in researching Virginia's road projects. I might thumb through this later on this evening.

Sudoku!

Just what is Sudoku?
The rules are simple: “Fill in the grid so that every row, every column, and every 3-by-3 box contains the digits 1 through 9.” But from that brief description, aggravation sets in.

“Sudoku” is a Japanese word that, roughly translated, means “unique number.” In Britain, in little more than six months, it has gone from obscurity to fad to mania.

The innocuous-looking logic puzzles, first introduced in November by the Times of London and then taken up by almost every other major newspaper in the nation, are causing commuters to miss their stops and students to skip their homework.
Sounds cool to me! But where do you find this "sudoku" you ask? Right here.

Logic puzzles. Gotta love 'em!

Tuesday, June 28, 2005

France Chosen As Site for Nuclear Reactor

Cool deal. No idea why France was chosen, but I hope it works!
An international consortium chose France on Tuesday as the site for an experimental nuclear fusion reactor, a $13 billion project that developers hope will one day generate endless, cheap energy by reproducing the sun's power source and wean the world off fossil fuels.

France beat out Japan to host the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor project, which is also backed by the United States, China, the European Union, Russia and South Korea. Nuclear fusion produces no greenhouse gas emissions and only low levels of radioactive waste.
France relies on well over 70% of it's energy needs from nuclear fission reactors, which is probably why it was chosen above all others. Japan, if you'll recall, was famous for its efforts to use plutonium in its reactors, causing infrequent accidents along the way.

Hopefully this isn't just a $13 billion tabletop. Looking forward to the results with interest!

Monday, June 27, 2005

The Ongoing Constitutional Convention. . .

The Supreme Court handed down a bunch of rulings today. I won't even bother posting links: just go to The Drudge Report and see for yourselves.

  • The Ten Commandments are allowed on government property as monuments, but inside the courthouse they are determined on a case-by-case basis.


  • Internet file sharing can be sued. Sorry guys, this is tantamount to banning roads because of drug trafficking. Ridiculous.


  • Cable companies don't need to share cable lines.


  • The reporters who leaked CIA information are going to jail it seems. SCOTUS wouldn't even hear the case.


  • Law enforcement cannot be sued for inadequately enforcing restraining orders. Fair enough -- I could just imagine a situation where police departments felt the pressure to ensure *all* restraining orders were being enforced. Yikes!


  • Chief Justice Rehnquist did not step down as anticipated.


  • Busy day, but a frustrating one as well. As a society, I am coming to believe we need a very serious discussion on the role and scope of the U.S. Supreme Court. I've heard the legal profession referred to as "the secular priesthood" before, but never have I seen it in practice as I have this week. Legislating from the bench and overturning law, introducing foreign jurisprudence, narrow definitions of law meant for the legislative branch to discern, arbitrary removal of property rights by government officials, and a power extending even to the point of determining who the next president is...

    The wheels are coming off. American Federalism was never intended to suffer a government this large and invasive, and our Constitution is cracking under the weight.

    Sunday, June 26, 2005

    Three priests walk into a bistro. . .

    No, it's not a joke, but it's a great story.

    I wonder if everyone who's considered the seminary has a story like this?

    Whack a (Commie) mole!

    Oh yeah! It doesn't get better than this!

    Mayweather Wins on TKO in 6th

    No knockout, and one round short. But Mayweather did it with a TKO in the 6th:
    In front of a sellout crowd at Boardwalk Hall, Mayweather backed up his bold statements with a virtuoso performance that was the boxing equivalent of a no-hitter.

    The slick and confident 28-year-old thoroughly dominated Gatti on Gatti's home turf, masterfully dodging punches and easily landing his own at will. The end came when Gatti could not answer the bell for the seventh round, but the result was obvious by midway through the second. Only Gatti's legendary courage -- and Mayweather's decision to taunt and toy with the champion before officially taking his belt -- kept it from ending earlier.

    'Gatti was tough, strong and came to fight,' Mayweather said. 'I respect him for giving me the chance to win the title. I boxed, and I stepped it up. He's a great champion, I'm a great champion. Everything I said about him before the fight was just to hype the fight.'
    And just to remind folks why speed is better than strength:
    "Too much speed," Gatti said. "Things weren't coming out right. . . . He's harder to hit than I thought."
    Comparing Mayweather to Ali is a fair comparison. I'm sure there's plenty of people who just don't like Mayweather's showboating and hype, but that's boxing.

    Mayweather-Hatton or Mayweather-Massua sound like the next probable fights. Either one should be great to watch.

    Chinese dragon awakens

    One of the blogs that I refer to on a regular basis is D.J. McGuire's China-e-Lobby. It's a great resource on the dissident community in the PRC and a great way to keep tabs on the Communist regime. Of course, I keep tabs on the geopolitical aspect, and while the Washington Times always beats the drum on this, I can't help but wonder whether or not we should be paying much more attention to Taiwan:
    China is building its military forces faster than U.S. intelligence and military analysts expected, prompting fears that Beijing will attack Taiwan in the next two years, according to Pentagon officials.

    U.S. defense and intelligence officials say all the signs point in one troubling direction: Beijing then will be forced to go to war with the United States, which has vowed to defend Taiwan against a Chinese attack.

    China's military buildup includes an array of new high-technology weapons, such as warships, submarines, missiles and a maneuverable warhead designed to defeat U.S. missile defenses. Recent intelligence reports also show that China has stepped up military exercises involving amphibious assaults, viewed as another sign that it is preparing for an attack on Taiwan.
    Pearl Harbor II is probably what our friends in Bejing have in mind, and I wouldn't be a bit surprised if we found ourselves attacked stateside as well.

    Something to keep our eyes on indeed.

    Fireworks Likely When NASA Blows Up Comet

    Coming to you July 4th:
    "It's a bullet trying to hit a second bullet with a third bullet in the right place at the right time,' said Rick Grammier, project manager at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena.

    Scientists hope the July 4 collision will gouge a crater in the comet's surface large enough to reveal its pristine core and perhaps yield cosmic clues to the origin of the solar system.
    Your tax dollars at work!

    Unrest 'could double' oil price

    From the UK Telegraph, a German firm is citing that a doubling of oil prices is possible: "The price of crude oil could soon reach $100 a barrel, compared with the present historic high of $60, if there was further supply disruption in Russia or a political upset in Saudi Arabia, a leading German institute said.
    The IFW World Economics Institute in Kiel said that any number of 'unwelcome developments' could provoke a crisis. Given that the industry was already producing at full capacity to meet soaring demand in China and India, there was almost no margin to absorb a sudden supply shock.
    Whenever I head the "doom and gloom" predicitons, I always wonder as to why no one has really developed an innovative way to manage a business using telecommuting. It would be the implementation of a processes, really.

    MS Project on steroids? Maybe. But if the problem is oil, and most of our demand comes from vehicles, one would think the easiest solution would be to get out of the 19th century mindset and start using the technology we have. Or just build better cars.

    Saturday, June 25, 2005

    Gatti - Mayweather

    Boxing is a pastime of mine, and while I don't keep the best tabs on the sport, I know a good fight when I see one:
    Big puncher vs. skilled boxer is usually a potent formula for fistic fireworks. That's the expectation Saturday night at Atlantic City's Boardwalk Hall, where WBC super lightweight champion Arturo "Thunder" Gatti puts his title on the line against top-ranked contender "Pretty Boy" Floyd Mayweather Jr.
    Mayweather is fast, as in Muhummad Ali fast. Gatti is a great fighter, takes punishment and throws hard, but in the contest of speed vs. strength, I'll take speed.

    There's no way I'm buying the PPV though, might have to find a different location or just catch the highlights after the match.

    Mayweather in 7. KO.

    The Tyranny of the Few Continues

    HoustonChronicle.com - Without comment:
    With Thursday's Supreme Court decision, Freeport officials instructed attorneys to begin preparing legal documents to seize three pieces of waterfront property along the Old Brazos River from two seafood companies for construction of an $8 million private boat marina.

    Simulated oil meltdown shows U.S. economy's vulnerability

    Not that I am a doom and gloom type, but this is a rather sobering article on the vulnerability of our reliance upon foreign oil as an energy resource:
    This year the world is consuming about 84 million barrels of oil a day. America alone guzzles about 20.8 million barrels a day. Experts think oil-producing nations have only 1.5 million barrels a day or less of unused production capacity right now. A disruption anywhere could cause market panic and spiking prices. That's largely why oil and gasoline prices are so high right now.

    Saudi Arabia and other countries are trying to increase production, but that won't help much before next year at the earliest. Meanwhile, any hiccup in production, delivery or refining could cause disaster.

    'A million or a million and a half barrels of oil a day off the market is a very realistic kind of scenario. You can think of a dozen different countries around the world ... where you can see that happening. Or even a natural disaster could do that,' Gates said in an interview.
    Perhaps one of the best articles I have seen on the situation. Read it all when you get a moment.

    Cuccinelli on Private Property

    State Sen. Ken Cuccinelli is tossing in his US$0.02 on the Supreme Court decision against property rights
    Perhaps even more troubling, it reflects the majority's assumption that private property rights do not really exist. Rather, individuals are simply "trustees" of the land, until the government decides that its transfer to another "trustee" would better serve its version of the "public good." This ruling shifts a massive amount of power from citizens to the government and opens the door wide to increasing abuse of that power.

    The Justices are charged with the interpretation of the Constitution. In this case, they were confronted with a prohibition: "nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation," and they have effectively re-written it as a grant of authority for local governments to redistribute private property according to any plan that any local government authorities believe to be economically beneficial. You read that right, the Supreme Court of the United States has sanctioned the redistribution of property. Who usually sanctions the redistribution of property? Well, let's see, there's the FMLN in Nicaragua, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Karl Marx was a big fan... what's wrong with this picture?
    Trustees is too mild a word. Serfs would be a better description.

    Friday, June 24, 2005

    Make some science

    Take the MIT Weblog Survey

    Prayer for the Intercession of Pope John Paul II

    The Diocese of Rome has issued this prayer to ask the late Pope John Paul II for his intercession:
    'O Blessed Trinity, we thank you for having graced the church with Pope John Paul II and for allowing the tenderness of your fatherly care, the glory of the cross of Christ, and the splendor of the Holy Spirit, to shine through him.

    'Trusting fully in your infinite mercy and in the maternal intercession of Mary, he has given us a living image of Jesus the Good Shepherd, and has shown us that holiness is the necessary measure of ordinary Christian life and is the way of achieving eternal communion with you.

    'Grant us, by his intercession, and according to your will, the graces we implore, hoping that he will soon be numbered among your saints. Amen.'
    For those of you unfamiliar with the Catholic practice of intercessory prayer, Catholics do not think of those who have passed on as dead and inert, but rather very much alive. Intercessory prayer (as opposed to worship, which is prayer reserved for the adoration of God), is almost the same as asking someone for a favor. We do it all the time on earth. Catholics simply ask those who have passed on in Heaven as well.

    The reason why this is being done is specifically to find instances where miracles can be attributed to the intercession of Pope John Paul II. If one miracle is confirmed, the person is titled "blessed". If two, then the person is confirmed a saint. So this is part of the beatification process.

    Just some background information in case you were interested.

    Thursday, June 23, 2005

    Tyrrany of the Few

    Eminent domain? Fine. Building roads, schools, and infrastructure? Acceptable.

    Taking other people's homes to build office complexes? What are we thinking?!
    A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that local governments may seize people's homes and businesses against their will for private development in a decision anxiously awaited in communities where economic growth often is at war with individual property rights.

    The 5-4 ruling - assailed by dissenting Justice Sanday Day O'Connor as handing 'disproportionate influence and power' to the well-heeled in America - was a defeat for some Connecticut residents whose homes are slated for destruction to make room for an office complex. They had argued that cities have no right to take their land except for projects with a clear public use, such as roads or schools, or to revitalize blighted areas.

    As a result, cities now have wide power to bulldoze residences for projects such as shopping malls and hotel complexes in order to generate tax revenue.
    Office complexes folks. This means that if a developer wants to buy your land and build whatever they so choose, so long as it is in the "best interests of the community" deemed by the local governing authority, the locality can exercise eminent domain.

    I hope this doesn't splash back on developers. In this instance, it's the unscrupulous ones demanding government step in that are the bad guys. The bad guy here is the Connecticut lawmakers willing to cave in and take this all the way to the Supreme Court.

    This is tyrranical folks. I don't like where this is going one single bit.

    Wednesday, June 22, 2005

    Poverty That Defies Aid

    Marian Tupy at the CATO Institute has an amazing analysis of the impact of Western aid to Africa:
    [B]etween 1960 and 2005, foreign aid worth more than $450 billion, inflation adjusted, poured into Africa. Result? Between 1975 and 2000, African gross domestic product (GDP) per capita declined at an average annual 0.59 percent rate. Over the same period, African GDP per capita fell from $1,770 in constant 1995 dollars adjusted for purchasing power parity (PPP) to $1,479.

    In contrast, South Asia performed much better. Between 1975 and 2000, South Asian GDP per capita grew at an average annual 2.94 percent. South Asian GDP per capita grew from $1,010 in constant 1995 dollars adjusted for PPP to $2,056. Yet, between 1975 and 2000, the per capita foreign aid South Asians received was 21 percent that received by Africa. The link between foreign aid and economic development seems quite tenuous.
    The solution? Better governance and open elections, not more international aid propping up failing regimes. Tupy offers the reason why:
    The truth is there are no quick fixes to African poverty. Like so many times in the past, the grand utopian visions of well-meaning Westerners are likely to crash on the hard rocks of African reality. In the end, Africans will get it right and prosper, but they will not succeed by seeing foreign aid as a panacea or hoping someone else will solve their problems for them.
    Indeed, and one of the major problems facing any government approach to social problems. More often than not, we only end up subsidizing the status quo, a condition which, in the case of the African continent, morally cannot continue.

    SkepticalObservor: A Pathetic Literary Foray

    This would make a great Flash animation.

    Death of the Referral Javascript

    For future reference to neophyte bloggers out there: foreign Javascript (i.e. scripts that run from someone else's web server) is bad.

    The ol' website should load much more quickly now folks.

    OMT: Meet Adam Piper

    Norman at One Man's Trash is giving Mr. Piper a hard time for this little tidbit in a recent mailing for Sen. Russ Potts:
    Virginia is counting on each and every one of us to ensure she has a Governor with the courage to lead and perseverance to do the right thing regardless of political consequences.
    She, eh? It's nitpicky, I know. . . still, it makes you stop and furrow your brow a bit (a bad thing in direct mail).

    Norman follows with some previous accolades for Mr. Piper, all of them earned. I happen to know Adam. He's a very smart guy who understands the nature of both grassroots politicking and access politics, which can only be an asset for an otherwise absurd and erratic Potts.

    Glad to see he's still active, though I am disheartened to see the company he's keeping. Best of luck Adam. You'll need it!

    Tuesday, June 21, 2005

    Asthma

    If someone can find the quick cure for asthma, or if you happen to be a large pharmeceutical company working on the cure, you will make millions of dollars off of me alone.

    Please hurry. Operators are standing by.

    NYT: Some Politics May Be Etched in the Genes

    Now this is an interesting study. At first I was a bit skeptical (how can you really measure this?), but once you read through the article the play between genetically identical twins and fraternal twins:
    From an extensive battery of surveys on personality traits, religious beliefs and other psychological factors, the researchers selected 28 questions most relevant to political behavior. The questions asked people "to please indicate whether or not you agree with each topic," or are uncertain on issues like property taxes, capitalism, unions and X-rated movies. Most of the twins had a mixture of conservative and progressive views. But over all, they leaned slightly one way or the other.

    The researchers then compared dizygotic or fraternal twins, who, like any biological siblings, share 50 percent of their genes, with monozygotic, or identical, twins, who share 100 percent of their genes.

    Calculating how often identical twins agree on an issue and subtracting the rate at which fraternal twins agree on the same item provides a rough measure of genes' influence on that attitude. A shared family environment for twins reared together is assumed.

    On school prayer, for example, the identical twins' opinions correlated at a rate of 0.66, a measure of how often they agreed. The correlation rate for fraternal twins was 0.46. This translated into a 41 percent contribution from inheritance.

    As found in previous studies, attitudes about issues like school prayer, property taxes and the draft were among the most influenced by inheritance, the researchers found. Others like modern art and divorce were less so. And in the twins' overall score, derived from 28 questions, genes accounted for 53 percent of the differences.

    But after correcting for the tendency of politically like-minded men and women to marry each other, the researchers also found that the twins' self-identification as Republican or Democrat was far more dependent on environmental factors like upbringing and life experience than was their social orientation, which the researchers call ideology. Inheritance accounted for 14 percent of the difference in party, the researchers found.
    In short, some people are more or less receptive to ideas that challenge their ideas based on genetics, while identification by party seems to be more of a factor of environmental conditioning than anything else.

    I do disagree with this though:
    "When people talk about the political debate becoming increasingly ugly, they often blame talk radio or the people doing the debating, but they've got it backward," Dr. Alford said. "These genetically predisposed ideologies are polarized, and that's what makes the debate so nasty."
    Reaction to ideas being genetic? I could see a scientific basis for that. How we react to those ideas? I'd like to think that's an environmental reaction rather than a pre-programmed one. Too bad they didn't include a set of questions testing that in the study.

    Benedict XVI: Church can never accept abortion

    The Vatican has published a new book of Pope Benedict XVI's addresses. Consisting of three separate works spanning from 1992 to 2005 and only 150 pages long, Benedict even goes into the question of whether or not the Church should accept abortion:
    'Why don't we resign ourselves to the fact that we lost that battle and dedicate our energies instead to projects where we can find greater social consensus?' he writes.

    Because this, he says, would be a superficial and hypocritical solution.

    'Recognizing the sacred nature of human life and its inviolability without any exceptions is not a small problem or something that can be considered part of the pluralism of opinions in modern society,' he writes.

    'There is no such thing as 'small murders'. Respect for every single life is an essential condition for anything worthy of being called social life.'
    He is absolutely correct. There can be no respect for society if there is no respect for individuals, which is why abortion and euthanasia only signify worse things to come for the future of society.

    Monday, June 20, 2005

    SkepticalObservor

    James Young at SkepticalObservor has a really clean web design. Moreover, it's filled with pretty good stuff. Check it out.

    Sunday, June 19, 2005

    Amrhine: A history lesson, Bush style

    While the rest of the world has Jeff Schapiro, we in Fredericksburg have Richard Amrhine. Amrhine, noted recently for his screed against Catholics, has decided to go after a more opportune target; this time the many errors (perceived and otherwise) of President George Bush.

    So what did President Bush do wrong today?
    Let's be frank, Ralph. Public radio and television programming has been perceived as having a liberal slant, just as all mainstream media are. That's why you want to do away with it. But perceptions don't make it so. This is speech that could be censored by axing its budget, so that makes it fair game. But that doesn't make it right. That you have the power doesn't mean you're required to abuse it.

    I was impressed, maybe even a little disappointed, with how balanced PBS and NPR 2004 campaign and election coverage was. So many stories on public radio and television tell us of the less fortunate, here and around the world, and of those who have overcome hurdles to succeed. Should stories about the toll American actions have taken on others not be told? I wonder what Native Americans might think about that.

    Indeed, $400 million is a small price to pay for stories that might not otherwise be told.
    Newsflash. If the programming is so popular, then why not let the individual who appreciate such programing fund it themselves?

    Next batter. . .
    Last week it was reported that government lawyers, apparently at the Bush administration's behest, backed off of monetary penalties being sought from Big Tobacco--funds that were to be used for smoking-cessation programs.

    The result of the 11th-hour change of direction is that the Justice Department won't ask for the $120 billion from Big Tobacco that would have targeted the 45 million Americans who smoke. It will settle instead for $10 billion earmarked for preventing future smokers from taking up the habit.

    The result is a break for big business, and a greater number of long-term smokers whose habit-related ailments will further overburden the nation's health-care system as the boomer generation ages. It's a typically short-sighted view from a short-sighted administration.
    This type of logic mystifies me. Tobacco causes lung cancer. So we squeeze the tobacco companies to pay for the health costs associated with it. Seems good at first, until you realize you are enshrining continued cigarette use as the only method of maintaining the cash flow for the health care costs. In the end, it's a Cartesian circle. Bush wants to end that.

    Next batter. . .
    This is the perfect example of dangerous policy that combines two Bush administration favorites: the politics of fear and the abuse of power. By using the former, he is seeking permanent authorization of the latter.

    ...

    It's the U.S. government's responsibility to keep us safe, but to accomplish that without compromising the personal freedoms that set us apart. Big Brother isn't welcome here, but no matter how the president tries to justify it, that is what he wants.
    Yeeeeesss. I'm sure he spends countless nights wondering how to restrict your freedoms.

    And for the grand finale:
    What he also wants is Big Moral Brother, a compass that always points toward the GOP conservative wing's view of things. The president approves of the precedent the government set by taking sides in the case of Terry Schiavo, the Florida woman who was allowed to die after subsisting for 16 years in a vegetative state. But about 80 percent of Americans, no matter where they stood on the issue, think government should have kept its nose out of it.

    The same holds true for embryonic stem-cell research. Large majorities of Americans, up to 70 percent, want the research to proceed based on the promise--not the guarantee--that it could hold the key to various maladies and diseases from which actual living people suffer.
    Let me get this straight. Big Brother saving the life of Terri Schiavo? Bad. But Big Brother telling you to "pay for stories that might not otherwise be told" on public television? Good?

    I'll say it as many times as it is necessary for liberals to understand: lawmaking is an inherently moral process. We expect lawmakers to enact moral laws, reject immoral laws, and have the ability to discern between the two.

    Nevermind that the polls applauding the death of Terri Schiavo were already cast into doubt the moment they emerged. Polls aren't the point. We let another human being die of thirst, whom otherwise would not have died.

    As for embryonic stem cell research, private firms can do as they please all day long. My tax dollars aren't being used to do something many in the bioethics field find to be offensive to the dignity of human life. I can appreciate that it is controversial, and I condemn the practice of using embryonic stem cells when human fat cells are just as productive. But why should the hand of government be involved?

    As for the closing Susan B. Anthony quote:
    "I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires."
    It sums up Mr. Amrhine's distaste for all things theistic quite nicely, naturally in a cloak of ignorance, but still it demonstrates a salient point. Belief in God, it would seem, must be tantamount to fanaticism. Thomas Merton, a Trappist monk, wrote that fanaticism was something God disdained because it resigned one's free will - a gift that God has given to us all. What God truly desired was a marriage of your will with His will.

    With that marriage inevitably comes the conclusion that what God desires is what you assent to doing. While I'm sure the late Pope John Paul II and Mother Teresa could easily tarred by Mr. Amrhine's misuse of Susan Anthony's quote (she used it as an argument for religious toleration, not a secularist quote at the expense and exclusion of religion), the veneer is seen through rather easily.

    So ends another downward spiral of liberal ranting. Not quite the level of "Good Copy", but regardless quite exemplary of the disjointed criticisms conservatives are facing these days. Yes, I'm sure the pendulum of political power will swing back to the Democrats one day, but by that time the Democratic Party will barely resemble the bygone days of 1960's radical liberalism. Already libearls too ashamed to carry the name are re-inventing themselves as "progressives."

    Democrats lost in 2004 because of a Bush-bashing platform. At some point, the die-hard liberals need to take the advice of their benefactor George Soros and simply move on.

    Brazilians buck rising gas prices with innovative fuel

    Want to kick that nasty foreign oil dependency? Brazil shows the way:
    Virtually all cars sold in the United States since the early 1980s can run on gasoline containing as much as 10 percent ethanol. In addition, there are an estimated 5 million 'flex-fuel' vehicles already on U.S. roads that can burn a mixture as high as 85 percent ethanol. But big logistical and political hurdles remain. Only a few hundred of the nation's approximately 169,000 retail gas stations are equipped to sell so-called E85 fuel. Nationwide distribution would require station owners to invest hundreds of millions of dollars in special tanks and pumps.

    Although U.S. ethanol makers say they could easily double their output to meet any increase in demand, experts say that's still a drop in the bucket compared with the tens of billions of gallons that would be needed annually to displace meaningful amounts of petroleum. The U.S. industry is loath to give up tariffs that protect it from cheaper alcohol from Brazil. Meanwhile, some environmentalists say feedstock such as grasses and municipal waste offer much more promise than corn. But huge investments in research are needed to bring the costs down for this so-called 'cellulosic' ethanol.

    What most can agree on is that Brazil is an example of what might have been if America had seriously committed itself 30 years ago to renewable energy.
    The investment has certainly paid off, with what the article claims to be a combination of public initiative and free market solutions.

    The industry has created 1 million jobs in Brazil. That's good news for rural farmers in America who are looking to the future.

    UPDATE: Some cars are already E85 compliant. Find out more information here.

    Happy Father's Day

    To all the dads out there, enjoy your day! I owe my father a phone call out in Ft. Leonard Wood (if he's not spending the day fishing).

    Saturday, June 18, 2005

    More on the FPA

    In the post-June 14th anaylsis, the Freedom and Prosperity Agenda is getting a second look, particularly from Norman Leahy and Jim Bacon.

    Now that we are once again posting a $1 billion surplus, the FPA should take center stage, and not necessarily from our conservative members of General Assembly. Frankly, I'd like to see this one emenate from the halls of the Obenshain Center first. . .

    . . . but that's just me.

    Wisconsin to Ban Morning-After Pill

    The Wisconsin General Assembly passed a law prohibiting morning-after pills on state college campuses:
    The legislation would prohibit University of Wisconsin System health centers from advertising, prescribing or dispensing emergency contraception - drugs that can block a pregnancy in the days after sex. The state university system has 161,000 students on 26 campuses.

    Republican Rep. Daniel LeMahieu introduced the bill after a health clinic serving UW-Madison students published ads in campus newspapers inviting students to call for prescriptions for the drug to use on spring break.

    'Are we going to change the lifestyle of every UW student? No,' LeMahieu said. 'But we can tell the university that you are not going to condone it, you are not going to participate in it, and you are not going to use our tax dollars to do it.'
    The ban does not extend to privately funded colleges or other state systems. Virginia has tried to pass similar legislation in previous General Assembiles.

    Friday, June 17, 2005

    VCU Study: Brain Size Correlates with Intelligence

    Phrenologists rejoice! Researchers at the Virginia Commonwealth University have determined that brain size does indeed correlate with intelligence.

    Of course, irony always manages to strike a cruel blow:
    'On average, smarter people learn quicker, make fewer errors, and are more productive,' McDaniel said. 'The use of intelligence tests in screening job applicants has substantial economic benefits for organizations.'
    Learn quicker?

    The U.S. military has long used ASVAB testing as a method of determining the MOS of new recruits. Not the most politically-correct indicator of job performance or ability, but certainly an interesting study nonetheless.

    Messaging for the Future

    Norman over at One Man's Trash has been reflecting on what Virginia conservatives can do to start offering some solutions.

    Correctly, he points to the Virginia Institute for Public Policy's Freedom and Prosperity Agenda as a start. I couldn't agree more.
    The Freedom and Prosperity Agenda focuses on four main areas - taxes and spending, property rights, education reform and transportation. The Agenda's planks are as follows:

      Eliminate the War of 1812 tax (BPOL)
      Taxpayer's Bill of Rights (TABOR)
      Eliminate the Death tax
      Eliminate the prepayment of the Sales and Use tax
      Redefine and limit the public uses for which private property may be confiscated
      Constitutional Amendment to base real estate taxes on the acquisition value of the property
      Parental choice in education
      Protect the transportation trust fund with a Constitutional Amendment
      Proposals for new taxes must contain sunset provisions
      Freedom and Fiscal Accountability Act for Virginia's Public Colleges and Universities
      Eliminate the Car tax
    In 1994, Republicans offered a Contract with America. Eleven years after the Republican Revolution, what has changed? Similarly in 2000, Republicans in Virginia took back the General Assembly. Five years after the changing of the guard, what has changed?

    FPA is a great start, and TABOR is the most critical plank in the entire schematic. But rather than suggestions (as the Contract ended up becoming in 1994), the FPA should be a similar agenda -- reforms we believe will restrict the size and scope of Virginia government.

    It's a good start, but there's room for improvement. For instance, restructuring VDOT and reforming the tax schematic in Virginia (localities and all) is critical - absolutely critical - before we start tinkering with the bells and whistles.

    Perhaps I'm one of the flat-earthers who wants to see dramatic change rather than reform.

    Thursday, June 16, 2005

    Bacon's Rebellion: "Virginia Is Not for Tax Lovers"

    The ongoing conversation at Bacon's Rebellion continues, with my US$0.02 added for good measure:
    The real question voters were asking was "what do we do about the problem?" Collectively, while I agree wholeheartedly with the Taxpayer Protection Pledge, we didn't have a single voice on how to solve the problem. Sure we can cut off the oxygen and put out the fire, but to what ends?

    I think voters are seriously looking for answers to the questions regarding transportation, education, and the like. TABOR is a good start. Devoting 65% of every dollar to the classroom is another (Virginia only allocates 61.6% on average). Restructuring VDOT so that rather than operating from the top-down, localities set the needs and agenda and VDOT chimes in. True tax reform that abolishes the car tax, property tax, estate tax, and comes up with a more equitable system of taxation that works at the local level first.

    Those are ideas. Those are solutions. While we aggressively promoted them in the 54th, conservatives statewide didn't speak with a single voice.
    Statewide, conservatives did very well. As always though, there is room for improvement.

    Hydrogen-Powered Motorcycles Just Around the Corner

    Closer, but at only 50mph, not quite what I'm looking for in a hydrogen-powered motorcycle.

    But close. Get that speed up to 85mph, and we'll talk.

    Virginia is Not for Tax-Lovers

    As the dust settles after the Tuesday primaries, the national conservatives are taking stock of the results:
    American elections have become so rigged in favor of incumbents that it can require a crow bar to wrench them out of office. So it's worth noting those occasions when entrenched officeholders do find a way to lose.

    In Virginia's primary races Tuesday, several Republicans who voted for the biggest tax increase in the commonwealth's history in 2004 faced single-issue anti-tax challengers. The most vocal of those pro-tax incumbents was so embattled that he withdrew from the race. Another was trounced, two-to-one, by a twentysomething political neophyte. Two others barely won, and in the statewide contests to select the GOP's Lieutenant Governor and Attorney General nominees, the tax hike defenders were upset by anti-tax challengers. Several other tax-raising Republicans beat back challenges more comfortably, but we suspect they also got the voter message.

    GOP taxpayers had reason to be upset because they now know the $1.4 billion tax increase was sold under false pretenses. Democratic Governor Mark Warner -- who had won in 2001 on a no-new-taxes-pledge -- argued that it was necessary to balance the state budget even as the reviving economy was creating a new revenue surge. This year Virginia is sitting on a $1.5 billion surplus thanks to a 14% rise in tax revenues.

    Will this surplus now be returned to taxpayers? Will it be used to kill the state's hated car tax, as Republicans once promised? Guess again. Mr. Warner and the legislators are spending the new money as fast as it comes in. Taxes are bound to be an issue in the general election this November, and it will be revealing to see if voters are up for imposing another round of accountability.
    In short, the message was sent and it is resonating.

    Wednesday, June 15, 2005

    Giscard Regrets EU Constitution Sent to French people

    Over the period of the election, I was reading a great book by George Weigel entitiled The Cube and the Cathedral, most of which centers around what Weigel calls the "historical amnesia" of the secular left's perspective on European (and sic Western) culture. So it's with a chuckle that - in the aftermath of the French rejection of the EU Constitution - I read this particular regret from its prinicple architect and his efforts to suppress the text:
    It was a crucial mistake to send out the entire constitution to every French voter, the architect of the EU's first constitution Valéry Giscard d'Estaing has said in an interview.

    ...

    One crucial mistake was to send out the entire three-part, 448-article document to every French voter, said Mr Giscard.

    Over the phone he had warned Mr Chirac already in March: "I said, 'Don't do it, don't do it'".

    "It is not possible for anyone to understand the full text".
    I could only imagine what we as Americans would say to a similar statement about our own Constitution. Sure it might sound trite (how many bills in Congress would the average American understand?), but this is a perfect reflection of the narrow complexities a more socialist orientation offers by nature, and why a legal framework rooted in the natural law perspective offers the freedom minus the legal gymnastics.

    Back to Business!

    With the primary election in the 54th District decided, the ol' blog has returned.

    For starters, let me thank everyone who worked so hard on the campaign. There is no way we could have achieved so much without your help in the trenches; doing mail, making phone calls, dropping literature, and working the polls in 100 degree heat.
    With 55 percent of the vote, he defeated Spotsylvania County Republican Chairman Shaun Kenney in a House of Delegates primary that drew only 7 percent of the 54th District's voters to the polls.

    Orrock wasn't elated with the results, admitting to his supporters that he hadn't won by the margin he'd wanted.

    Kenney won in seven precincts --all in Spotsylvania--of the 21 precincts in the district, which includes central Spotsylvania and the Woodford area of Caroline County.

    He told his crowd of about 30, gathered at the Massaponax Howard Johnson, that the showing was respectable.
    We ran a great campaign, and it's because of your hard work. Conservatives made a great showing against a 16-year incumbent who outspent us 5:1. We spent $27 per vote compared to the opposition's $64 per vote, which doesn't go unnoticed. Toss Democratic crossover in the mix, and given the odds we did one heck of a job. Bobby Orrock ran a tough, professional race and won it by the rules. It was a conversation about the direction of the GOP worth having. I'm proud of what we accomplished; with no regrets.

    The even better bit of news is that Kilgore is set to become the next governor of Virginia, with our very own Bill Bolling and Bob McDonnell is support. That's a great ticket folks, one I'm proud to work towards victory for in November.

    In any event, I'll be back to blogging, commentary, papers, and other such activities in no time. Some of the links are a bit choppy, but they'll come back within the week.

    Thanks again guys. On to November!

     

    RedStormPAC

    $

    JEFFERSONIAD POLL: Whom do you support for Virginia Attorney General?

    1) John Brownlee
    2) Ken Cuccinelli

    View Results

    About

    ShaunKenney.com is one of Virginia's oldest political blogs, focusing on the role of religion and politics in public life. Shaun Kenney, 30, lives in Fluvanna County, Virginia.

    Contact

    E-mail
    RSS/Atom Feed

    The Jeffersoniad

     

     


    Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites Powered by Blogger


    Archives


    March 2002
    April 2002
    May 2002
    June 2002
    July 2002
    August 2002
    September 2002
    October 2002
    November 2002
    December 2002
    January 2003
    February 2003
    March 2003
    April 2003
    May 2003
    June 2003
    July 2003
    August 2003
    September 2003
    October 2003
    November 2003
    December 2003
    January 2004
    February 2004
    March 2004
    April 2004
    May 2004
    June 2004
    July 2004
    August 2004
    September 2004
    October 2004
    November 2004
    December 2004
    January 2005
    February 2005
    June 2005
    July 2005
    August 2005
    September 2005
    October 2005
    November 2005
    December 2005
    January 2006
    February 2006
    March 2006
    April 2006
    May 2006
    June 2006
    July 2006
    August 2006
    September 2006
    October 2006
    November 2006
    December 2006
    January 2007
    February 2007
    April 2007
    June 2007
    July 2007
    August 2007
    September 2007
    October 2007
    November 2007
    December 2007
    January 2008
    February 2008
    March 2008
    April 2008
    May 2008
    June 2008
    July 2008
    August 2008
    September 2008
    October 2008
    November 2008
    December 2008
    January 2009