Wednesday, April 30, 2008

RWL: McDonnell and Kilgorism

With the Virginia Rightosphere mightily pleased about the total endorsement of the Republican Party of Virginia of the McDonnell-Bolling(-Cuccinelli) ticket, D.J. McGuire sigh mournfully... because he's seen this before:
See, over the last few years, I have seen annual attempts to “unite the Republican Party in Virginia.” They have all been followed by the same things: issue-less campaigns, lost leads, surprising (to some) defeats, recriminations, and grudges that go so deep into the next election cycle that the same people try to “bring the party together” and start the cycle all over again.

The first and most obvious of these fiascos came in 2005, when Jerry Kilgore led the state GOP ticket. The party had just been through a vicious policy battle over taxes - one which became a political battle as several tax-hiking GOP Delegates faces primary challenges. Kilgore had a choice: accept the division as a reality and pick sides, or make broad and bland “unity” statements that papered over the serious differences.

Kilgore chose the latter, and ended up with a lower percentage of the vote than any GOP nominee for Governor had earned in twenty years.
No question, the Kilgore campaign the RNC's mishandling of the Kilgore campaign was atrocious. RNC staffers swooping in, taking over and pushing out traditional volunteers and unit organizations... much of which instigates the catcalls about RPV to this day (hint: RPV isn't RNC, but I've groussed about this in the past).

Of course, 2009 is much different than 2005... no looming billion-dollar tax hike (passed under Republican eyes), Virginia Senate Republicans brought back to the realm of common sense, no future prospects for President in 2008.

Then there's one major difference we all seem to neglect: Bob McDonnell is no Jerry Kilgore. As the McDonnell campaign begins to swing into gear, we'll see some major initiatives that will be red meat for both fiscal and social conservatives.

Even "classical liberals" such as Mr. McGuire will be impressed. Time will tell the tale.

GDP? Up by 0.6%

The American economy grew ever so slightly during 1st Qtr 2008, which is moderately good news. The skies aren't so grey after all.

Monday, April 28, 2008

FLS: Frawley faces another DUI charge

This will make DUI number three for the University of Mary Washington's former president:
According to Maryland court records, Frawley was stopped by police at 10:50 p.m. on April 10 at 2908 Virgilia St., in Rockville, Md., driving a 1997 Toyota with Maryland tags. The court records indicate he produced a Maryland driver’s license.

He was charged with "driving (attempting to drive) a vehicle while under the influence," according to court records.

UMW’s Board of Visitors fired Frawley last year after he was arrested twice in two days on driving under the influences charges in Virginia, first in Fairfax on April 10, 2007, then the next day in Fredericksburg, when a fellow motorist reported someone driving across the Chatham Bridge with a front tire missing. He told a police officer he had consumed six bottles of cough medicine, according to a police report.
Don't know the gentleman in question... perhaps only by reputation. This is entirely not in consonance with Frawley's former reputation at Mary Washington.

I sincerely hope he finds help soon. Stories such as these are difficult to read, but hopefully will make an excellent opportunity for Frawley to rebound (and a great story for both him and perhaps a rarely-forgiving press to tell).

Novak: "Communion as a matter of course"

Columnist Bob Novak takes pro-abortion Catholics to task, as well as the Catholic bishops who permitted them to receive the Eucharist.

...which in turn, I hope, may have helped spur this from Cardinal Egan:
The Catholic Church clearly teaches that abortion is a grave offense against the will of God. Throughout my years as Archbishop of New York, I have repeated this teaching in sermons, articles, addresses, and interviews without hesitation or compromise of any kind. Thus it was that I had an understanding with Mr. Rudolph Giuliani, when I became Archbishop of New York and he was serving as Mayor of New York, that he was not to receive the Eucharist because of his well-known support of abortion. I deeply regret that Mr. Giuliani received the Eucharist during the Papal visit here in New York, and I will be seeking a meeting with him to insist that he abide by our understanding.
Very appropriate for a shepherd leading his flock, and it fits very well in the pro-life footsteps of his predecessor, Cardinal John O'Connor. Statements such as these take courage too... and for this Cardinal Egan is to be commended highly.

SCANDAL: RPV's John Hager Is Taking Down DNC's Howard Dean!

(crossposted over at Bearing Drift)

Meet the Press talked it up over the weekend, as did several Virginia news outlets. After meeting with representatives from the Obama and Clinton camps weeks ago (and talking heavily about it in the press to show "unity"), the DNC launched a fierce attack ad against Republican nominee Senator John McCain.

The problem? Co-ordinated efforts in excess of $5,000 are illegal. Not just a little illegal either... this is the sort of stuff that shuffles front offices.

DNC's response? A nasty, vitriolic version of "YEEARGH!!!"
Hager alleged in an affidavit to the Federal Election Commission that the DNC coordinated the ad with the campaigns of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. That would violate federal election law.

"This is just another GOP lie in the Bush-McCain tradition, but it doesn't change the fact that John McCain doesn't understand the economy," said DNC spokesman Luis Miranda.
One minor problem: DNC co-ordination does break the law.

Of course, the fact that the DNC spokesmanperson couldn't bring himself to deny co-oordination digs up more questions than answers.

UPDATE: RPV follows up with a release this afternoon:
“Not only are the Democrats blatantly distorting comments made by John McCain, but they are clearly breaking the law in order to do so,” said Hager. “The DNC should immediately pull this ad. If they refuse to do so, then Senators Clinton and Obama and their supporters, including Governor Kaine, should call on the DNC to stop running the ad.”
Just in case there is any question as to whether or not DNC was co-ordinating with the two Democratic contenders, check these quotes out (no links provided... but we're properly citing evidence here):
DNC “officials have met in recent days with the top campaign brass of Sens. Barack Obama (Ill.) and Hillary Clinton (N.Y.) to brief them on the committee’s plans in the coming months. (“DNC Officials Huddle With Clinton, Obama Campaigns” by Chris Cillizza, Washingtonpost.com, April 25, 2008)

“I don’t think we have to bring up age,” said Cornell Belcher, an Obama pollster who collaborated on the DNC’s McCain poll. “I don’t think we will”…Since the Democrats have not yet settled on a presidential candidate, Dean was joined in making the polling presentation by Belcher, one of Sen. Barack Obama’s pollsters, as well as Allan Rivlin, whose polling firm does work for Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y. (“Dean: McCain’s Age Worries Voters” by Teddy Davis and Mike Elmore, ABCNews.com, April 10, 2008)
DNC Chairman Howard Dean was naturally more flippant than usual when asked about the scandal this weekend. Of course, the great undercurrent of the story is that RPV Chairman John Hager virtually single-handedly is taking on the national Democratic Party and causing quite a stir. If the FEC levies a fine against the DNC this early in the game without some massive changes in the leadership, this will cast a pall of unethical behavior over the entire Democratic Convention, not to mention severely hamstring the eventual Democratic nominee in 2008.

DEVELOPING...

Sunday, April 27, 2008

Guess I Won't Be Using Royal Caribbean

Read this:
The Cortes family says their Royal Caribbean cruise was a living hell. They boarded the Majesty of the Seas on Monday out of Miami. Tuesday night, they were kicked off the boat in Nassau.

"Everyone was crying and pleading that they wouldn't throw us of the boat, begging them if we could stay," Luis Cortes said.

Their 7-month-old child, Zoie, was throwing up and had diarrhea. A doctor on the ship said she was dehydrated and had to be treated in a hospital. The family said a security guard gave them 10 minutes to pack their bags and get off the boat. It was 11 o'clock at night.
Royal Caribbean says they will give a credit for the trip, but no reimbursement for their re-issued passports, one-way fare to get back home, or the emergency room bill.

Oh, and the baby? Sick with a cold.

The Uno

Move over Segway... the Uno has arrived:
Operation of the 54.4 kg (120 lb) machine is simple, in fact it's so simple there are no controls except for an on-off switch. To go forward you simply push your body weight forward to tilt the machine. To back up, just lean back on the seat to tilt it backwards and back it goes. The farther you lean, the faster it accelerates. The gyro tells the ECU how much to accelerate and that in turn delivers the proper amount of current to the electric motors, one for each wheel.
Wonder how fast it really goes? (answer: 40mph top speed according to some sites...)

Your Three Minutes of Civilization

Vivaldi's third movement from Spring, as performed by Nigel Kennedy:

Not a bad way to go into thinking about the next week, eh?

Saturday, April 26, 2008

Liveblogging the 5th District Convention

I'll be heading down to the 5th District Convention momentarily as a delegate for Fluvanna County, but while I'm there supporting my friends I'll be mixing with the crowd and getting a proper sensus fidelium from our friends in Southside Virginia.

Not knowing whether or not I will actually have internet access at Hampden-Sydney, I will either post as I can, or I will simply give a running tally at the end of the day.

If you're going to 5th District, Mrs. Kenney and I will see you there!

10:31am: Packed auditorium... have already made the rounds meeting Chairman Hager, AG McDonnell (whom I personally congratulated on helping to save St. Joseph School), State Senator Frank Ruff and Delegate Poindexter. Bolling is seated in the pews as is Rep. Goode. Cuccinelli is here as well, handing out stickers and receiving a warm reception.

George Sterling is moving to and fro,.. doing his best herding cats. The 10.00am cutoff for registration was not enforced, as several people were ushered in by Tucker Watkins at the last minute (about seven or so running late). Meeting has been called to order, but no movement (yet).

Crowd is a sea of McDonnell and Goode stickers, with plenty of well made McCain/Gilmore split stickers (nice) interspersing the Marshall ones.

10:35am: Meeting called to order....

10:36am: Sterling greets all, talks about how beautiful Hampden-Sydney is (and it is -- almost a cross between Mary Washington's campus and Fort Belvoir). Sterling is boosting Goode... and doing a tremendous job. Going after Obama and Hillary, but particularly Obama. Pushes against Mark Warner (boos from the crowd), talks about Governor Gilmore who will talk more about that.

"With opponents like these, we'll not only elect a new Republican senator from this state, but we'll elect John McCain the next president of the United States." -- George Sterling

10:39am: Invocation. Extremely well done.

10:40am: Sterling asks for all veterans to stand and be recognized. Gilmore, Frederick, and McDonnell do so, amidst others.

10:41am: Singing of God Bless America -- by the entire convention floor.

10:43am: Colonel Robert Cranston leads in the Pledge.

A Texan, volunteer wtih Texas National Guard, became Sgt. Major, joined OCS, was at D-Day +1... asked by Eisenhauer to serve in Paris as a part of NATO staff, in charge of Armed Forces Radio. Bronze Star, Purple Heart (wounded in the Battle of the Bulge)... this gentleman is extremely well decorated, inducted in the Army Public Affairs Hall of Fame.

Remarkable.

10:46am: Sterling thanks his Executive Board for serving the following two years. Cuccinelli is recognized by the chair, as are other notables. The McDonnell/Bolling ticket receives warm applause. Tucker Watkins is recognized, to slightly less applause. Randolph Byrd is also recognized as a former chairman, but is a delegate.

10:49am: Keith Drake reports from a Resolutions Committee. Four resolutions.

Joe Bishop receives a resolution thanking him for his work. Joe was a great human being, whom Mrs. Kenney knew through the Jefferson Society while at UVA -- I knew through helping Gilmore in 1997.

Charles Hawkins receives a resolution thanking him for his 26-years of service in the General Assembly. Much emphasis place upon his public service with regards to conservationism. This one is presented in print. Nicely done. Hawkins speaks after the resolution is read, and takes a trip down memory lane when Republicans were not even a blip on the Virginia radar. Leaves us with thoughts:

"It is our charge that our society moves along with the same legacy our forefathers left to us." -- Former State Senator Charles Hawkins

Hawkins attacks the idea of debt as a way to pay for public services, passing our costs onto the next generation. If we do not stop selling the public for things we cannot afford, we will be selling the future for a "bag of marbles." A $9 trillion national debt is not a legacy we should be proud of... one last thought. The future is bright becasue of you. What we do will determine what Virginia does in the next decade. In short: Don't sell our future.

Reaction from the convention? A standing ovation.

Allen Dudley receives a resolution commending him for his service, including a successful fight against the closing of DMV offices in Franklin County, Amber Alert, utility restructuring, and his general demeanor at General Assembly.

Dudley thanks the crowd, and thanks his district for electing Poindexter as his successor.

Jean Trent receives a resolution for her activism in Mecklenburg County, as well as her leadership and ability to recruit candidates for public office. Sterling follows it up with an award for outstanding service, signed by John Hager and George Sterling.

The crowd is on their feet again for a rather lengthy applause.

Jean emphasizes the importance of grassroots, raising money, and emphasizes the importance of our elections for Goode and McCain, and hopes everyone will "really get out and beat the bush and win these elections." Neat.

11:10am: Sterling says that before we do the election of temporary chairman, they will allow some of the candidates speak.. starting with AG McDonnell.

McDonnell's sister had a baby last night, and is on his way to Norfolk (!) later today... but wanted to come this way to thank 5th District for all their work.

I have to say... McDonnell's tone, his approach, and his personality are really coming through. Very personable, very good speech.

McDonnell's charge? First: Know our record, and be ambassadors for it. Republicans have done great things in Virginia... all sorts of reforms have helped make Virginia the best place in the nation to raise a family and do business. Second, build the party by Labor Day! McDonnell is really emphaising his and Bolling's confidence in RPV... well done. Lastly, he asks for unity... stumps for Gilmore, stumps for McCain.

"I've never understood Obama's "hope and change" message... but now I get it, because you better hope you have change left after he's done." -- McDonnell on Obama

11:18am: Gilmore's up... and Rick Sincere just sat in front of me with a camera!

Bah... I can see around him. (YouTube video inserted here.... eventually)

Gilmore notes his fellow veterans in the room. No tie, looks much more relaxed than I've previously seen him run. The speech is still a bit rusty, though. Talks about how he and Roxanne first met while at UVA going door to door in Charlottesville. Talks up his previous notches -- former AG, former Governor, former RNC Chairman, and just re-elected to the NRA board.

"When he says he's gonna do something, he does it. I have always done what I've said I'm going to do." -- Former Governor Jim Gilmore

Car tax, lottery proceeds to education, emphasize education, new jobs in Virginia (250K jobs)... and now the pro-life issue....

Some folks have said Jim is pro-abortion... for a North American Union... he laughs, but no one else does. Gilmore says he's a pro-life guy, always has been. Says he was the best pro-life governor in this state. We agree on the theology, and we agree on the science... we know when life begins. Always been the same... and after eight weeks, you could enforce a law.

He's not going to change his belief structure to get more votes, then lists a series of laws he passed (or signed) on pro-life issues despite his eight-week exception.

If you're really pro-life, he implies, would you rather see Senator Mark Warner voing on Roe v. Wade, judges, and such with a President Obama in charge of a filibuster-proof Senate?

But there are differences between him and Mark Warner. Jim Gilmore (in third person)hammers taxes, energy independence (to applause) including drilling in ANWR, and offshore drilling (Gilmore favors).

He offers a ray of hope for folks who doubt we can win against Mark Warner: McCain will carry Virginia, if we do our jobs... the people of Virginia will not be inclined to send a Democrat into the U.S. Senate.

Mark Warner's broken promises? Car tax, the $1.4 billion tax hike of '04, and now Warner says he wants the federal tax cuts to... go away? If he says he's not going to raise our taxes, and we can't believe him, we'd better believe him when Mark Warner says he will raise our taxes!

More rah-rah for Gilmore, for the campaigns, and makes a personal pitch for money to the crowd. Palpable change in the mood of the room... yikes...

Sterling pats him on the back... Gilmore closes. Only a 12 min speech, though. Overall, he did well, though his pro-life speech probably wasn't convincing or necessary.

No Bob Marshall. Anywhere.

11:30am: Bolling's turn, and always a great speaker.

Lots of places where we could be today, on such a great day. But we're here because we believe in good government, and Bolling appreciates all the work we do.

Some are pessimistic, but Bolling encourages us to remain optimistic. We believe in our common-sense approach to our government; that's why we send all our great representatives to Richmond, and why we will send back "one of America's great congressmen, Virgil Goode."

"We live in a country where the only limitations are the limitations you put upon yourself." -- Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling

But just because Virginia is a great place, and just because America is a great place -- it doesn't mean it is always going to be that way. It was built on principles, and when government grows our liberty shrinks. That America is best kept safe by remaining strong abroad. And no surrender on the War on Terrorism.

"In the War on Terror, they need to understand one thing: We win, they lose." -- Bill Bolling, on negotiating with terrorists.

McCain will be a better president than the likes of Obama or Hillary... and Bolling doesn't care who we supported in the primary season. The future of this country is at risk, and when we leave today we need to emerge John McCain people.

11:40am: Mrs. Kenney is getting kicked by baby Kenney. Heh.

11:41am: Bolling is winding down. Boosts Gilmore, boosts Goode. "This Red State is still red!"

Strong applause.

11.42am: State Senator Frank Ruff for an introduction... Virgil Goode.

Ruff puts in a good word... describing the length of his district from "Kent's Store to the North Carolina border." Nicely done.

Ruff talks up Virgil Goode's committment to principle, and by example uses the 20-20 split in the Virginia Senate when Goode fought for proportional seating on committees. Ruff brings him up, the crowd give the requisite standing ovation.

I've never heard Goode speak before (at least in performance mode). Thanks George Sterling for his work at 5th District, thanks Chairman John Hager for his work, Hawkins, Dudley, Ruff, Cuccinelli, Poindexter, thanks Delegate Jeff Frederick for "being here today."

"McDonnell and Bolling. Thank you for coming together as a unified team!" -- U.S. Rep. Virgil Goode

Goode really is an old school speaker... something you might think of hearing from the great speakers of the turn of the 20th century (Teddy Roosevelt-ish).

Goode talks about the U.S. Senate for awhile, warning about a 60-seat Democratic majority.

While McCain was not Goode's first choice, there is a world of difference between McCain and the Democratic nominees. Goode takes aim at Obama's $845 billion plan for a "global war on poverty" -- Goode says we're giving enough away, and foreign aid needs to be slash.

"I have not been politically correct during my tenure in U.S. House of Representatives. If re-elected, I won't be either." -- Virgil Goode, to the applause of the 5th District Convention.

Goode talks up the Federal Marriage Amendment. Goode supports it, his opponent disagrees.

Goode talks up the 2nd Amendment. Goode supports it, and has no idea where his opponent stands. But Goode is firm that the 2nd Amendment is an expressed individual right, not a right reserved to the militia.

Goode thanks his wife for looking up all the blogs (gulp!), emphasizes his 100% pro-life voting record, and pledges to keep it when re-elected. Goode's opponent is a "follower of choice", which is quote, "a smooth-talkin' word for abortion."

Emphasizes his record as a expense cutter as one of the lowest spending congressmen in Washington.

Goode says there's a lot of things to cut... and one of the things he'd cut would be foreign aid. If we're going to be spending it overseas, why not spend it in this country (said a very animated Goode -- Rick is still filming away).

Immigration....

Goode is for the fence, will continue to support the fence, and will continue to support funding for the fence. Illegal immigrants take our jobs, use our health care, and have comic books to show them how to get across. Some might might say "we didn't cross the border, the border crossed us." Goode goes on to defend the Mexican War... we won, you lost, get over it (that's not what he said... but that's close).

Vote conservative, Save America. Massive standing ovation to cries of "Virgil! Virgil! Virgil!" My, oh my...

11:56am: Sterling pumps Goode again. And now we move into electing a Temporary Chairman.

State Senator Frank Ruff is nominated as Temporary Chairman by acclimation. Moved, seconded, and done.

Sterling thanks folks for his service (briefly) and moved on.

Sharon Jones nominated by Sterling, seconded by Tucker Watkins.

Ruff makes a series of appointments... and we're on to temporary committees!

Here. We. Go.

11:59am: George Sterling moves to dispense with a reading of the call. Moved, seconded, passed without objection.

Ruff introduces Ken Cuccinelli. Ken's introduction of himself and what he stands for?

"Drop Virgil Goode in Fairfax County. There you go." -- Ken Cuccinelli

Very complimentary of Goode. Cuccinelli identifies himself as a conservative Republican protected by the Endangered Species Act (crowd laughs), and talks about grassroots politics. Ken mentions that he has been outspent in every election. Talks about life beginning at conception (strong applause) that taxes and spending are too high (applause), and strong property rights.

"Rule of law is the foundation of everything we hold dear in this country, and I see a tremendous drift from those principles right here in Virginia." -- Ken Cuccinelli

Ken emphasizes that he really doesn't belong in politics... he has six kids back home. Doesn't know why some people run, but no one wonders why Ken Cuccinelli is in public office. To stand for life, smaller government, protect property rights, and protect the principles of the Constitution he has sworn to uphold.

On the 2nd Amendment, he is very confident that we will see a big win for the 2nd Amendment being defined as an individual right more than anything else (to great applause). Ken was ahead of the Kilo decision, protecting property rights.

Open to talking to folks... looking forward to everyone's support in 2009 to fill out this great ticket we have and sweep the Dems in 2009. Closed to a heck of a lot more support than what Ken opened with!!!

12:09pm: Speeches from RPV Chairman candidates (Rick is back!)

Hager goes first... said that both George and Susan Allen asked to pass along their thoughts.

Hager wants to finish the job, the hard work of McDonnell and Bolling and Goode, to do the "nuts and bolts" of grassroots campaigning. We've had four chairmen over the last five years.

Our job? Beating Democrats. And we need to spend it on all our candidates, not just raise it and not spend it (which would be a HUGE reform if those decisions could be pried from the House and Senate...), but most of all we need the ground troops out on the ground this year in November, which McDonnell and Bolling are helping.

Hager gives me a hat tip for reaching out to the new media. Aww shucks. Wants to build on it.

Hager emphasizes our regional offices, but makes it pretty clear that we will have a great deal of support going into 2008 and making sure our candidates have what they need to get elected. Very happy to have the support of so many, wants to keep the machine going.

12:14pm: Jeff Frederick's turn.

Emphasises that 500,000 people voted in the (then-decided) Republican Primary, but 1,000,000 voted in the (then-and-still heavily contested) Democratic Primary.

Frederick talks about Republican losses over the last four years. He's talking to fast for me to blog him... but says if we want Democratic wins, then maintain current leadership.

Commends RPV for doing all they are doing, but Frederick emphasizes that results are the only measure of success at the end of the day.

Frederick assumes the mantle of Cuccinelli -- has better things to do with his time. Has a beautiful daugther, but wants her to grow up in a George Allen Virginia, not a Nancy Pelosi Virginia.

We need a RPV of bold colors, not pastels. Rejects the top-down approach Richmond has been imposing. If we give units the resources they need, we will start winning again.

Says RPV is the "center-right party" but that Frederick knows how to run and win. Ruff taps his shoulder, Jeff says he's not done. Frederick talks about the demographics of his district, says he still won. Opposed the Warner tax hike, 100% pro-life record, 100% Family Foundation rating, A rating from NRA, wants to get tough on illegal aliens, raised $1.3 million for his campaign alone, understands how to use technology.

Ruff now gets vocal... asks Jeff to move along. Jeff speeds it up, ends at 12:22pm. Mort Blackwell has a law of the public policy process... that the mind can absorb no more than the seat can endure. Natives were indeed getting restless (natives defined as Frank Ruff).

12:23pm: Credentials Report!

226 eligible delegates to vote at the 5th District Convention.

Some confusion as for one person (Mary Burton) not being properly certified, but the body would like to certify her. Passed unanimously (227 delegates now).

12:24pm: Rules Committee! Motion that the Rules be adopted as written. Moved, Seconded, and Passed without objection.

12:25pm: Nominations Committee! Tucker Watkins and Tim Boyer, host of others for State Central, RNC Convention Delegates, and National Elector.

Discussion on the report.

Jeff Frederick stops by to correct ask about what I wrote about Frank Ruff giving him the hook... I show him. It was a bit abrupt... but all's well that ends well.

Some confusion as to one ballot not being in everyone's packet of ballots, but the three State Central Committee members running (Renee Maxee, Chris Shores, and Jean Smith) have been moved to be approved by floor vote. All three elected, no opposition.

Some additional confusion now as to who has received a ballot and who has not. Some folks do not have ballots (they were handed out in front before folks came into the auditorium), but the situation is being rectified.

12:32pm: Resolutions Committee has eight resolutions to recommend to the floor, but will vote on those at a later time.

12:33pm: Ruff explains how the ballots will be calculated, that unit chairs will not have to do the calculations -- the "vote counters" will do this.

Two candidates for Chairman to speak. Tim Boyer goes first.

12:34pm: Tim rallies the troops to elect Goode and McCain. Freedom is the ability to change the way we are doing things. The way we have been doing things isn't working. Grassroots and volunteer politics.

15 years of experience in Campbell County, including the Marriage Amendment. Tim Boyer says that it's this fire from the grassroots that is so desperately needed in the GOP today.

Most important ingredient for success? Truly principled candidates -- and we need more of them. Lots of Reagan quotes, emphasizing limited government. Followed Jeff Frederick's comments as both the problem and the solution.

Tim closes by saying that we must leave a legacy of limited, principled government. Very strong applause... probably some of the strongest of the day.

12:39pm: Keith Drake, former Albemarle GOP Chairman to nominate Tucker Watkins.

Drake highlights Tucker's committment to bring Virgil Goode to the GOP.

Tucker opens up loud: "This is a district that DOES NOT LOSE TO THE DEMOCRATS!"

Highlights his role in outworking the Dems and getting Poindexter elected (and mentions beating Ferguson CM Joey Stanley as a highlight). Tucker highlights that he has talked to every single GOP chairman save one, all his endorsements, and his "Wilting Weed" blog. Emphasizes his "Goode Smokes Weed" hats and stickers.

Rarely do you get to see Tucker Watkins so motivated. Ruff gets up, "I'm not sure Goode was a big fan of those hats," to the laughter of the crowd.

12:46pm: Votes for Chairman commence... Hager comes over and talks to me, "So, what did Jeff Frederick have to say to ya?" I told him... he laughed.

12:47pm: Tucker is working the floor. The Boyers are doing the same. Boyer's applause was louder than Tucker (either that, or Tucker's booming voice was a stark comparison to any applause... heh).

12:49pm: Carrie Wigal demands some props. Props are thusly delivered.

Pizza has also been announced!

...and Cuccinelli has stood up to speak for Bob Marshall. OUTSTANDING.

Cuccinelli remarks on how Marshall was one of four endorsements Cuccinelli received when he first ran. Marshall is strong on life beginning at conception (applause) and talks about Marshall's strength standing up to the special interests in Washington.

The Democrats didn't win the elections in 2006 -- we lost it because we didn't maintain our discipline on spending and taxes, and Marshall has done that his entire time in the General Assembly.

Cuccinelli moves onto the taxing authorities... Marshall voted against it, and took it to court -- and he won. Only Bob Marshall stood between those unconstitutional taxing authorities and taxation without representation.

Marshall led the fight for the Marriage Amendment, a "no-brainer" down here... but in Northern Virginia you have to fight for it. The fact we have to argue about it is appalling, but Marshall has fought for those issues. Warner opposed them.

Marshall stands up for conservatives, even when others in the Republican Party waver. Cuccinelli has respect for Jim Gilmore, but Marshall is willing to stand up even when Republican leadership doesn't want to hear from him is a quality we need in the U.S. Senate.

Marshall would be reinforcements for the Tom Coburns of the world, and Capitol Hill needs it now more than ever. Marshall's unwavering committment to conservative principles will need our help to get them elected.

One comment on McCain from Cuccinelli: We have continually heard that we have our concerns about McCain, but we'll support him. The reason why we lost control of Congress is because we lost our discipline on spending, and you know what? It's John McCain's greatest strength. But we do have problems with conservatives and McCain. With Marshall as our Senate candidate, he can bring votes to the ballot box for John McCain in a way no other candidate can.

Marshall has beat Warner on regional government, Marshall beat Kaine on HB 3202, and he's exactly the kind of guy we need in Washington.

12:59pm: Pizza!

1:22pm: Still eating pizza... Ruff is talking to Sterling about some procedure. Someone made a joke about the folks in the room convening the floor and nominating a chairman (Augusta-style) and it got a lot of laughs. Repeated it to Frank Ruff, who made a brief feint towards the door before laughing it off.

1:33pm: Chirs Schoenborn (Chair, Albemarle GOP) was given ballots by people who have already left... wants to know what to do about them. No word as to how widespread that problem is...

1:37pm: Rick Boyer (brother of 5th District Chairman candidate Tim Boyer) is walking around thanking everyone for their support and help. He doesn't know the results. I told him, "Look at it this way: whatever the outcome, it's over! Right?" He nodded approvingly... but he's got a full plate with law school examinations coming up.

Crowd was called back in, but no activity towards announcing the vote totals, and no movements by the chair. Ah well... hope the air conditioning holds out.

1.41pm: Vote is Tucker 268.33, Tim 224.75. Tucker Watkins is re-elected to another term as Chairman.

Speeches now for RNC Delegates... all sorts of fun. All in all, an extremely well run event (much thanks to State Senator Frank Ruff for waving the gavel) and much credit belongs to Sterling and the 5th District Executive Committee for putting on a pretty smoothly run convention!

I'll have a final update once I get back to Kent's Store, give some thoughts then.

Friday, April 25, 2008

Jewish Man Wins Change to Church-Only Softball Policy

From Caroline County comes this piece of news:
Lieberman, 43, said he hasn't played softball in years, but thought it would be fun to "get a little physical activity and hang out with the neighbors."

Lieberman, of Ruther Glen, said he was told that it was a church league and he must attend a church in the county to play.

When he replied that he is Jewish and there are no synagogues in Caroline County, he was told he could not play. He said he hung up in disbelief.

"It was kind of surreal to me. I wasn't sure if I heard what I thought I heard," he told The Associated Press on Thursday.
Surreal indeed.

Thursday, April 24, 2008

RWL: What Does Saxman Know That Gilmore Doesn't?

D.J. McGuire prints the transcript of Del. Chris Saxman's interview with the Augusta Free Press:
Keep in mind, Graham didn’t push Saxman on this; he wasn’t even expecting it to come up at all. Saxman took it upon himself to disabuse Graham of the notion that Gilmore’s nomination was a done deal. That should tell you how much credibility to put in Gilmore’s victory declarations.
Of course, it would be pretty poor strategery (sp!) to tell your troops "the nomination is in the bag" when it is anything but.

Either Gilmore has this in a walk, or conservatives are getting ready to pull one of the most massive upsets in a nomination contest since Mike Farris in '93. It can't be both!

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Your Three Minutes of Civilization

Monday, April 21, 2008

What We Are Doing to the Blogosphere

I mean, it's true? Right?

Bionic Eye

Now this is cool! I wonder at which point you consider the cyborg argument though...

Friday, April 18, 2008

For Just One Day, I Am a Barack Obama Fan

Of course he was giving her the one-fingered salute.

Hillary deserves it. Republicans have been offering it to her since 1993.

(h/t to Below The Beltway)

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Save the GOP: McCain Calls for Suspension of Federal Gas Tax

That would mean an $0.184/gallon tax break for every working family in America. Gas up twice a week at 15 gallons? You'd likely save over $66 this summer. Go on vacation? Gas up more often? Well... your tax break becomes even more relevant.

Well played. For budgets where an extra $100/mo makes the difference, that sure is good news.

Roanoke Red Zone: Phone Booth Republicans

Brandon Bell makes a fair point, and D.J. McGuire brings it full circle with the way western and eastern Virginians define what is important.

But I want to bring Bell's finer point to light, because it's worth mentioning:

Anyone who has been involved in politics for a while knows that these mass meetings are never perfect. They are run by volunteers. Not professionals. As a party leader, Kurt Michael (and others) knew that mistakes were being made. Instead of acting the statesmen and offering to help, they waited until they could take advantage of the parliamentary technicality and defy the will of the majority. Some leader, huh?

So you ask, is this the way to build a party? Is this the way to heal old wounds? We all know the answer. But I’ve come to realize something. Michael and crowd don’t care. They never have. And they don’t really care about ideology. What they care about is power. And they will do anything, including the destruction of their own party, to get it and keep it. Sadly, the same power grab is happening in the Sixth District Committee, with Jim Crosby challenging current Chairman Fred Anderson for the top spot.
Cast the names aside for a moment, because it doesn't matter who the names are.

In the struggle between "big tent" and principle, what precisely is the long pole? What is the one unifying principle that motivates all of us to work together and beat the Democrats?

Any party, any association of like-minded souls needs to have that one brass ring that unites those who disagree on finer points.

D.J McGuire brings up excellent points as to how the east vs. west defines what is important -- fiscal conservativism vs. social conservativism. I would probably hasten to overlay how the tactics are vastly different between more urbanized Virginians (NOVA vs. ROVA -- but a variant thereof) living in the Golden Crescent and those outside of the economic boom.

Of course, without principles and without a long pole, there is no tent. So what you have happen is a battle over principles... and eventually, you whittle yourselves into a party that can fit into a phone booth. Isn't this what happened to the Libertarian Party?

The battle for principles was lost the moment Republicans gained a majority and did nothing to reduce the size and scope of our government -- plain and simple. Counties such as Augusta that are writhing in pain are doing so for lack of leadership, not for lack of principle and certainly not for want of trying.

Whether the process is natural or manufactured (or acerbated) due to personalities is something we'll never fix. But at some point in time, leadership will not become a function of compromise. Rather, the leadership the Republican Party needs will be a function of principle -- a uniting principle that brings fiscal and social conservatives together for a time no matter how brief.

Reagan did this. Gingrich did this. Goldwater almost did this. In Virginia, former Governor George Allen did this based on a platform of reducing the size and scope of government... and we have survived on the carcass for nearly 15 years.

Look around. The grassroots complain, but the remaining activists (who haven't been pushed out) are lazy compared to the Dems. The leadership pontificates, but offers no real substance to the base. Voters listen, but have long ceased to care.

This is not a cycle that is going to end easily.

Keep this in mind too -- the Democrats were in precisely this position in 2000, and found themselves in it again in 2004. What pulled them out? One principle: hating President Bush. Six years later, they took Congress.

That's not much of a principle, and the Congressional Democrats have quickly discovered that it is not enough to govern (just what have they accomplished, anyhow?) and certainly not enough to help their nominee in 2008. Nevertheless, it was enough to grant them power for two long years.

Republicans won't need much. We just need something we don't have yet. When we find that principle, the big tent will be easy enough to bring back. Until then, expect good and bad people to fall by the wayside -- in Augusta and elsewhere.

In the meantime, wise party leaders will continue to build the apparatus that will take the best advantage of the eventual upswing... and it'll come.

There's probably an excellent mathematical model for all of this, but there's no need to bore folks with details. Suffice to say, this is all perfectly natural in any given bottoming-out process, and pendulums always swing...

The Write Side of My Brain: DPVA reveals new logo

Hilarious. Or absolutely embarassing.

(h/t to TWSoMB)

Politico: Pope's visit renews abortion debate

About time, though sadly some pro-abortion Catholics are intent and focused on receiving (and thereby politicizing) the Eucharist.

It's sad, really...

SMH: Don't Be Evil or don't lose value?

Australia's Sydney Morning Herald brings up a question that is often debated but rarely as focused upon as it would be in any other organization... except Google:
Some have interpreted the ceaseless criticisms of Google's privacy policies and its co-operation with totalitarian regimes as a sign the Don't Be Evil goal is unattainable for a profit-driven company. At the very least, the corporate motto has encouraged the public and the press to hold Google to a higher standard.

"It really wasn't like an elected, ordained motto," Google's vice-president and 20th employee, Marissa Mayer, said in an interview during her trip to Sydney last week.

"I think that 'Don't Be Evil' is a very easy thing to point at when you see Google doing something that you personally don't like; it's a very easy thing to point out so it does get targeted a lot."
I certainly hope that Google isn't backpedaling from its "don't be evil" motto -- unordained or not.

In fact, as a motto it forces Google employees to seriously think of the consequences of their work. Above all else, as a user it certainly enables me to trust Google to do the right thing... depending on how Google chooses to define "evil".

ParentalRights.org

Mike Farris is heading up ParentalRights.org, an effort to protect the child-parent relationship from the long arm of the government:
Only a constitutional amendment will ensure that the courts of our nation protect the fundamental right of parents to raise their children. And only a constitutional amendment will override international law that seeks to undermine the parental role. As the only complete solution to the danger confronting the child-parent relationship, the Parental Rights Amendment will place current Supreme Court doctrine protecting parental rights into the explicit text of the Constitution. Only a constitutional amendment completely eliminates all threats to the child-parent relationship. It is the only comprehensive response to the attack on parental rights across our nation.
I have a name for such amendments. They're called "Sky Is Blue" amendments, because while it makes perfect and total sense to most of us, to our legal system we have to spell it out in clear and precise terms that the sky is -- indeed -- blue.

Monday, April 14, 2008

George Will: A Libertarian Surge?

Writing in Newsweek, columnist George Will speculates on the effects of a Bob Barr candidacy in 2008:
Shane Cory, the Libertarian Party's executive director, knows that directing libertarians is like herding cats—almost a contradiction in terms. But he thinks his party is upwardly mobile. In 2004, its presidential candidate received just 397,265 votes, a mere .32 percent of the national popular vote. The party did best in Indiana (18,058 votes, .73 percent). But in no state was the Libertarian vote larger than the winning candidate's margin of victory. This year, however, Cory thinks the party can far surpass its best national performance—921,299 votes (1.1 percent of the total) in 1980. It has recruited 600 down-ballot candidates around the nation (including Michael Munger, chairman of the political-science department at Duke, who is running for governor of North Carolina) and expects to have 1,500 by Election Day.

...

Barr's new party (he joined in 2006) also is handicapped by John McCain's handiwork. One wealthy libertarian would give $1 million if the McCain-Feingold law regulating political participation did not ban contributions of more than $28,500 to national parties. Another wealthy libertarian—he is dead, so he has none of the supposedly corrupt purposes that make McCain so cross—bequeathed more than $200,000 to the party. That would fund the ballot access struggles, but it is in escrow because of McCain-Feingold. If libertarian voters cost McCain the presidency, that will be condign punishment.
I know D.J. McGuire has strong feelings that a Barr ticket helps (not hurts) McCain... but as Will explains, the elements are there for the LP to bring some heat. If certain Libertarians disenchanted with the straightjacket of McCain-Feingold decide to turn those millions into 527 money, this becomes a whole new ballgame...

Democratic Central: Levar Stoney new DPVA Executive Director

DPVA gets kudos over at Democratic Central for their newly minted ED Levar Stoney.

I hope this isn't the same Levar Stoney cited here:
Two key prosecution witnesses testifying about the tire-slashing incident at Republican Party headquarters on Election Day 2004 said yesterday they heard the five accused Milwaukeeans brag of the deed.

But defense attorneys also were able to get Levar Stoney, of Virginia, and Leshaunda Joy Williams, of New York, to admit they lied to Milwaukee Police Department interrogators shortly after the Nov. 2, 2004 incident in order to safely flee the city. Stoney and Williams both were in Milwaukee to help hype Dem turnout in the final weeks of the Kerry-Edwards presidential bid.

Both Stoney and Williams told the FBI in subsequent interviews that they heard most of the five men brag about their role in the slashing of tires on nearly 100 vehicles rented by the GOP.
Of course, all denied involvement... until the FBI got involved. See here and here for the hand-washing performed afterwards:
On election day, Simmons spoke with Mohammad, who said he was going to get an article about the tire slashing that was on the Journal Sentinel’s Web site and frame it. "Simmons stated that he interpreted this as a sort of 'you can’t catch me' type statement by defendant Mohammad," the complaint reads.

Another election worker, Levar Stoney, told an FBI agent in Virginia that he had been "taunted" for dropping out of Operation Elephant Takeover but that the five defendants talked afterward about how many tires each had stabbed while Mohammad ran interference, the criminal complaint says.
What happened afterwards was a political who-shot-John, with both sides (namely, the in-state and out-of-state Democrats) pointing fingers at one another as to who performed Operation Elephant:
Prosecutors say the five defendants left the Democratic campaign office at about 3:30 a.m. the morning of the election and slashed the tires of the vans around the perimeter of a dirt parking lot to prevent the GOP efforts.

Lawyers for the five defendants, however, say the national "political operatives" are in fact slashed the tires and then, when authorities began speaking with them, pointed their fingers at the five defendants to save their political careers.

The testimony of Smith and her three out-of-state co-workers, Myesha Ward, Levar Stoney and Lashaunda Williams generally echoed previous statements of Opel Simmons III, an earlier witness and the leader of the get-out-the-vote group who told jurors of the defendants' behavior after the alleged slashing.

But like Simmons, the witnesses all admitted to lying to police in the hours after the slashing and then changing their stories in interviews with FBI agents during the months after the election.
Let's hope we get a committment from Mr. Stoney that this style of politicking stays in Wisconsin -- not in Virginia.

Now At The Podium: Wandering My Way Back Into the Blogosphere...

Phil Chroninger is back!
I have to blog again...can you blame me? I mean, in times like these, I have to cling to my blog, because I'm just a typical small-town resident who is bitter.
One of my favorite bloggers in Virginia, to be honest.

you don't need it.

Nicely done.

Sunday, April 13, 2008

CNN: Hillary Hearts Whiskey

Crown Royal to be precise, which isn't a bad choice at all.

Of course, if McCain or Obama were caught drinking hard liquor... watch out!

RWL: Marshall has half of the delegates in CHESTERFIELD?!?!

Bad news if true for the Camp Gilmore. Of course, delegate counts are notoriously off... and in the end, it's not who signs up -- it's who shows up at the end of the day that wins.

WaPo: Gilmore's Aides Confident He's Ahead

This has been the topic of many conversations over the last week.

Camp Gilmore says it's over, the votes are there, and are going out of their way to prove it. There's no panic at the head office, and while the "it's in the bag" talk has dissolved, no one has quite pushed the panic button yet.

Meanwhile, the mood at Camp Marshall is optimistic, but not the sugary optimism one expects from a race that knows it's going to get beat. In fact, I would say the opposite -- Marshall's staff doesn't just believe it can win... they are expecting a win and don't really go out of their way to prove it.

My honest view from 30,000 feet up? Take my old stomping grounds in the Fredericksburg area for instance.

Spotsylvania? 3:1 Marshall.
Stafford? Majority Marshall.
Fredericksburg City? Majority Marshall.

Here's the kicker:
But based on early returns from the county meetings, Gilmore strategist M. Boyd Marcus said "there really isn't any doubt" that Gilmore will be the nominee because he is winning big in many rural counties as well as suburban Richmond and Hampton Roads.
Is Boyd right? I've cautioned that this might be the case, though I can confirm that in humble Fluvanna, Bob Marshall will do well (provided everyone shows up).

Now I don't have the familiarity in places like Fairfax, Prince William, and Chesterfield that others might have. So this very well could be a blowout in the rural parts of the state while social conservatives and Northern Virginia get swamped out.

On the other hand... if Gilmore is conceding NOVA, and the social conservatives are turning out in places with contested unit chairman seats, the quiet confidence of the Marshall coalition between NOVA/SoCos/anti-HB 3202 crusaders/Davis supporters just might have more weight than folks care to realize just yet.

The catch?
"They really don't have anyone on their side that has really done this before," Marcus said of Marshall's campaign. "They never really understood what was happening around them. You can't build support on a statewide basis in a month or two."
This is true. Then again, in the 1st District convention now-Congressman Rob Wittman didn't have anyone who did this before either. Staff only gets you halfway there...

Surely it's all uphill for Marshall. But history (remember Mike Farris?) often vindicates the most socially conservative candidate. After all, isn't that why Gilmore wanted a convention in the first place against Davis?

Saturday, April 12, 2008

Mason Conservative: Davis Supporters Flocking (Gently) to Marshall?

Of course, the intent of the post is to sound out whether Marshall has sufficiently swayed Chris Beer's vote, but there's some interesting intel information that I can certainly confirm:
Hyland is right that Davis supporters are banging down the doors for Marshall, but there is quiet fist-pumping among many Davis supporters when you talk about Marshall's candidacy. Marshall is also universally respected among those who know him. He's doctrinaire, but he won't stab you in the back. Let me tell you, among Davis supporters, there is real anger at the way Tom has been treated by the state party after all the work and all the money he spread around to help elect Republicans all across the commonwealth in the last few years. Whether its fair or not, Gilmore gets hit with that anger. There is also genuine resignation that Gilmore will get blown out by many up here and he has shown no reason yet how he won't. For Marshall, many up here just throw their hands up and say "what the hell, why not?"

I don't know. I'll be a delegate in Richmond next month and I while I'm supporting Gilmore now, I was also ready to support anyone else. I was at the state central meeting where Tom got slapped in the face, and I haven't forgotten about that either. It wasn't just a slap in Tom's face, for many of us from Northern Virginia it felt like a slap on all our faces. And the irony is that the convention was suppose to guarantee Gilmore the nomination, and now its being used to prevent it.
Politics makes strange bedfellows, but it shouldn't shock a soul that Marshall and Davis can work together. Differences aside, both are known as party-builders par excellence.

Has anyone figured out yet that it is an alliance of Northern Virginians plus social conservatives that have put us over the top time and time again in the past?

Hillary Clinton = Jim Webb

The new Hillary Rodham Clinton: Now 50% more pro-gun with added Jesus!
For the third time since Mr. Obama's remarks were made public Friday night, Mrs. Clinton criticized him at length, saying his comments seemed "kind of elitist and out of touch."

"I disagree with Senator Obama's assertion that people in our country cling to guns and have certain attitudes about immigration or trade simply out of frustration," she said.

She described herself as a pro-gun churchgoer, recalling that her father taught her how to shoot a gun when she was a young girl and said that her faith "is the faith of my parents and my grandparents."
You know it's bad when HRC criticizes someone as "kind of" elitist and out of touch. What the hell does that mean, anyhow -- "kind of" out of touch?

Friday, April 11, 2008

Augusta is Burning

Tough Mass Meeting last night in Augusta County.

Of course, Augusta isn't the only one with such battles, but it does speak to the dissention in the ranks of the GOP that we seem to be walking more towards an old-1970's Libertarian Party ethos rather than the Reaganesque big tent of years past.

Antipoleez

Well now... isn't this special:
AntiPoleez eliminates bad breath resulting from consumption of alcohol, tobacco and food. Unlike breath fresheners and gum AntiPoleez does not just mask the unwanted odor with heavy mint or fruit scent, it eliminates it and does not leave any other. The unique combination of components work to increase the consumption of breath producing molecules by the epithelium of the mucous coat of the upper respiratory passages resulting in clean, fresh breath. Despite the level of effect that AntiPoleez has against odor producing substances it does not contain any chemicals but only natural ingredients and no artificial flavors and complies with FDA regulations.
Super-Altoids?

$10 says it tastes like crap.

Thursday, April 10, 2008

B4Marshall: Gilmore bloggers hype his big government record on education - again

I don't know if Jim Gilmore has any control over his "bloggers", but trumpeting as an achievement the spending of budget surpluses towards public universities rather than returning them to the taxpayer doesn't seem like the best move to underscore one's fiscal conservative values. D.J. McGuire explains:
One of the many things the American right has done to change the debate on education in general is to force Americans to see that a government monopoly is not the best way to deliver education. At the K-12 level, this has led to numerous conservative proposals for education reform under the e umbrella of educational choice - in essence, taking the entire idea of government help for education and restructuring it so that the students, not the institutions, are aided. The conservative movement is making similar moves in housing, medical insurance, and other areas.

Gilmore’s tuition freeze, by contrast, moves in the exact opposite direction. It doesn’t strengthen individual choice; it limits it by forcing them to use public education in order to benefit from the aid. It doesn’t embrace the free market; it distorts it by using government power to artificially lower the prices for government-funded universities to the detriment of private and religious ones.
Artificial subsidization of public institutions kills private and religious universities. Not a difficult concept to master, unless you're a big-government type... and there's a party for that.

What's more disturbing at this point is the utter lack of message control... where once again, Marshall's conservative record has zero apologies to make.

UPDATE: Kenney the Younger sees the same problem (and coincidentally attends VCU). Is anyone watching the Bloggers 4 Gilmore henhouse?

Conservativa: John Hager for RPV Chairman

The momentum builds. Read it all.

WaPo/Hill Poll: Connolly Up 20 Points

Not good news for Leslie Byrne, though I'd be more interested in head to head polls vs. Republicans.

Tuesday, April 08, 2008

Rule .303: Mountain Lions in Virginia: How They're Here and Why It's Denied

Fairly compelling argument from Jackson Landers over at Rule.303:
In a nutshell, officially admitting that there are wild cougars in Virginia invites a political mess that none of these people really wants to deal with. Can you really blame them? So in response to sighting after sighting and article after article, DGIF and other agencies give the same old 'swamp gas and weather balloons' routine, as if we were talking about unicorns or velociraptors hiding out in the Blue Ridge Mountains.

Their potential 'out' when some hunter finally shoots one and forces the issue into everyone's lap is the fact that, as I have explained here, odds are that these are not in fact eastern cougars at all but rather exotic pet trade hybrids. Hybrids which have no official status in wildlife regulations and are not considered endangered animals.

At that point, DGIF will almost certainly attempt to calm everyone down by pointing out that these are the product of escaped pets. This is what other states have done in the same situation. That takes care of the legal protection issue, but as for the rest it changes nothing. In terms of either safety or a desire to restore the old ecology of Virginia with a large, top level carnivorous cat, who the heck cares what subspecies it is? The worst part is that people usually swallow this kind of crap. And certainly DGIF will say that we have no reason to think that the escaped animals are breeding, so they don't really count, etc. But you'd have to be a complete idiot to think that there is any reason why these cats wouldn't be doing what comes naturally and breeding in the wild.
Now I have never seen one of these bad boys running amok in my part of Fluvanna (might have heard one out towards Luray -- sounds like an angry baby crying), but I have had the pleasure of running into black bear from time to time... even in Spotsylvania County there were black bear sightings in and around the battlefields.

Heck, anyone care to guess how long ago it was when people said that coyotes weren't a problem... until folks started shooting them in and around Fort A.P. Hill? I wouldn't put it outside of the realm of possibility that eastern bobcats are still running amok in Virginia.

Pope: Looking Forward to U.S. Visit

See... the Pope videoblogs!

Nice... even Pope Benedict XVI gets the new media!

J’s Notes: On Jeff Frederick’s Run For RPV Chairman

Kenney the Younger takes notes on Jeff Frederick’s bid to sack John Hager as Chairman.

I have strong feelings on this, but as the delegate totals begin to roll in, Frederick is a long shot (at best) in pulling off any upset at the Convention.

Monday, April 07, 2008

Barticles: Nudge Nudge, Wink Wink

Bart Hinkle over at the RTD gives a wink and a nudge towards Cass Sunstein's newest book:
Cass Sunstein, who has previously argued essentially that all rights are granted to us by government, argues in a new book, Nudge, that people should be allowed to make choices, as long as they are directed to make the right choices.

...

They are, then, "libertarian paternalists," or perhaps paternalistic libertarians.

Perhaps they say it with a wink. Because it’s a little like being an establishmentarian revolutionary, or an Islamic-jihadist agnostic.
Precisely. I've offered my thoughts on this soft paternalism when it reared it's head in the UK Economist, but it seems as if the ill-conceived idea of the "avuncular state" is picking up steam.

Saturday, April 05, 2008

On Devotion

Publius Decius Mus was by this time a veteran in the eyes of his Roman legions.

Commanding the right wing, Decius began to feel his ranks give slowly at first. As the Latins on the slopes of a then-dormant Mount Vesuvius pressed their attack, the first line of the Roman army began to ebb, then press into the second. Decius rallied his veteran triarii and turned towards an old priest named Valerius.

Decius never had to ask. The priest produced his toga proetexta, a fine cloth reserved for the worship of the pagan gods of Rome. Placing it over his head, Decius stepped lightly over his javelin, pressing it into the dark soil.

Slowly at first, then proclaiming it loudly so his veterans could hear, Decius invoked the names of the nine gods to accept his devotion: Save the legions, place fear in the heart of Rome's enemies.

Decius sent word to the Roman left, climbed his white horse, and with his toga fluttering Decius threw himself into the Latin lines, and sacrificed himself.

The Roman armies saw this, and knowing what Decius had just performed, they now knew their Roman gods had been delivered the Latin host by virtue of the blood of their leader. The Latins, not comprehending what was quite occurring, began to lose their discipline...

The Latins wavered. The other Roman consul, one Titus Manlius Torquatus, received word of Decius' devotion and whipped his legions into the Latin lines. It worked.

Believing their victory was now secured by this supreme act of devotion by Decius, the Roman legions utterly destroyed the Latin armies, ending their independence and subjugating them to the Roman Republic.

The year was 339 B.C.

***

President Abraham Lincoln stood at the edge of a green field. Four months earlier, 15,000 Virginians had charged the fields at Gettysburg only to be repulsed by Federal armies. Personally, Lincoln was still too disgusted to remark fondly on the battle -- General Meade, after smashing the Army of Northern Virginia deep in Pennsylvania (or deep enough for Lincoln), was aghast as Lee and his tattered Confederates were allowed to escape back across Harper's Ferry and trickled back into the Shenandoah to fight another day.

Gettysburg marked a dual high-water mark for the Union. Vicksburg's fall was something more than coincidental, as the Confederacy was now reeling from the effects of the Union blockade.

The crowd gathered to hear Lincoln speak that afternoon could see the freshly dug trenches -- and graves -- that lined the battlefield, the seminary, the orchard, and the town.

Lincoln fumbled for a moment with his spectacles.... his long nose and lanky features made him instantly recognizable, as if the man held the weight of the world on his shoulders. Lincoln took a breath... and spoke, about liberty and continents, about "civil war" and "hallowed ground."

Lincoln's eyes rose. "The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract." His eyes fluttered over the crowd before he went back to his hastily written notes.

Did Lincoln think of Decius? Perhaps a professor in the crowd, or a minister trained in the classics could strain to hear it above the wind.

"It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us," Lincoln stopped for dramatic pause, "that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion," Lincoln's voice stopped, his eyes rose again, "that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain -- that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth."

The Gettysburg Address lived on, almost as a second Declaration of Independence.

The year was 1863 A.D.

***

2,202 years passed from Decius' own act of devotion to Lincoln's brief acknowledgement of the devotion of his soldiers at Gettysburg. Both of these images are blood-drenched, and they would not be isolated.

Indeed, Decius would find imitators. Forty-five years after the battle against the Latins, the Roman legions would find themselves outnumbered and outmatched against the Gauls. It would be Decius' son who would find yet another javelin, pronounce the name of his sacred Gauls, and sacrifice himself to his nation. With victory assured (Decius had performed the devotion, yes?) the Romans threw back the Cisalpine Gauls in yet another tremendous victory. In the American tradition, the devotion of our patriots has watered the tree of liberty from time to time, in every generation from the Revolution to the present day -- and always in the name of freedom.

Devotion is easy to mock. True believers do what timid souls will not, or cannot. Naturally, not every form of devotion is the same, but the impulse to sacrifice one's self speaks highly of the human race, and to the ends for which we were designed. But it is because of that higher purpose that we find those willing to give all -- even unto themselves.

***

"He will glorify me, since all he reveals to you will be taken from what is mine," the Galilean leaned forward as he spoke. "Everything the Father has is mine; that is why I said: all he reveals to you will be taken from what is mine." (John 16:14-15)

The men around the table were confused. Certainly they were not Romans -- what could this possibly mean that by dying one could gain eternal life?

They would learn -- and in time imitate such an example -- one devotion at a time.

This Is Absolutely NUTS

Read this and be disgusted (or inspired):
One of the most competitive categories is blogs about technology developments and news. They are in a vicious 24-hour competition to break company news, reveal new products and expose corporate gaffes.

To the victor go the ego points, and, potentially, the advertising. Bloggers for such sites are often paid for each post, though some are paid based on how many people read their material. They build that audience through scoops or volume or both.

Some sites, like those owned by Gawker Media, give bloggers retainers and then bonuses for hitting benchmarks, like if the pages they write are viewed 100,000 times a month. Then the goal is raised, like a sales commission: write more, earn more.

Bloggers at some of the bigger sites say most writers earn about $30,000 a year starting out, and some can make as much as $70,000. A tireless few bloggers reach six figures, and some entrepreneurs in the field have built mini-empires on the Web that are generating hundreds of thousands of dollars a month. Others who are trying to turn blogging into a career say they can end up with just $1,000 a month.
Of course, the article goes into the downsides... constant contact, little sleep, refusing to let others "get the jump" on a story, all the things one might attribute to the stereotypical Lois Lane.

Now here's the trick: Try being a Communications Director in this environment. Heh.

LP: Bob Barr for President?

Leslie Carbone tips us off, says former Rep. Bob Barr is thinking about running for the Libertarian Party nomination. Deeper reading sees that the same team that built Rep. Ron Paul's web presence for his 2008 presidential primary bid is ready to do it again... for Barr.

You can check out Barr's position on issues here, and find out what the lunatic MoveOn.org fringe is going to say about him here. My favorite line (well, my second favorite line) is this:
Barr served as House manager in the 1998 impeachment circus, again demonstrating his manifest contempt for the will of the majority of the American people who twice elected Bill Clinton to be their president.
Will of the majority? Will of the plurality sounds more like it... but with prejudices such as those, you can tell this is a fella the arch-liberals simply despise.

QandO: Rules, rules, rules ...

McQ over at QandO brings up a great point: If the Dems were running a "winner take all" system for delegates, Hillary Clinton would be winning the nomination in a walk.

My personal preference is that you practice for gameday. Therefore, if the state's Electoral College delegation is winner take all, then shouldn't the national party expect their candidates to operate under a similar system?

This doesn't mean Hillary is the best candidate (the polls right now are showing otherwise), but it does mean that Hillary may have had the best overall strategy to win the heads-up contest against John McCain.

We'll see.

BVBL Gets More Love

This time from the Democratic National Committee, who can't tell the difference between a Google Ad and their elbow.

...and these people want to lead the country? Pfft.

Friday, April 04, 2008

Waldo Jaquith: Our morality, shared and unshared.

Interesting post and subsequent article (titled to serve the bias of Psychology Today's readership) regarding problems of moral foundations with regards to opinions:
A significant reason that I find traditional partisan political discourse increasingly frustrating is each side’s unwillingness to comprehend that their opponent’s perspective is almost surely an honest one, rooted in firm moral beliefs. Lakoffian disciples believe that this is a problem of language, that they’re talking past each other. But it’s more than that. It’s two people with different moral norms, different imperatives, who don’t know that they have different norms.
Of course, it's hard to even discuss the article when it summarizes the differences thusly:
For liberals, morality is pretty much about harm and justice. To decide whether a policy is wrong, they want to know whether any one will be hurt by it and whether it will be fair to all those affected. Conservative care about harm and justice too, but they also care about three things that liberals tend to ignore: purity, respect for authority, and loyalty to the ingroup. Consider gay sex. A liberal will say, as long as no one is harmed, we should not prohibit gay sex; indeed such a prohibition would be unfair. A conservative might say that gay sex can be prohibited on the grounds that it is impure ("an unnatural act"). Or consider flag burning. A liberal will again say: no one is harmed, and everyone has the right to self-expression. Conservatives will say that flag burning is an act of desecration that disrespects the authority of this great nation. Or take preemptive war and regime change. Liberals will caution that it is bad to harm others and unjust to threaten the autonomy of other nations. Conservatives will focus on the threat that others pose to us here at home, and they will plaster their cars with stickers that say "support our troops," showing deep concern for the ingroup.
That is idiotic.

Of course, the article turns to Lakoff (a UC-Berkley linguist who dabbles in philosophy from time to time) and discusses problems of perspective between American liberals and American conservatives -- labels meaning quite different things on the other side of the Atlantic, in philosophical circles, and even amongst political science profressors -- and ends with some relativistic nonsense about how moral values may or may not be universal, because if they were we'd agree on everything all the time...

The problem -- as I see it -- isn't one of language. Nor is the solution a search for a common agreement on all things under the sun. The problem is cultural in the sense that Americans love a good fight, no matter what the reasons.

Additional culture problems would be an emphasis on emotion over reason (when was the last time you heard of an elementary or middle school teaching logic?) and the terrible, deplorable state of education in this country. If education's prime mission is the transmission of culture to the next generation, we are failing miserably. Worse, we may be wildly succeeding in transmitting the worst aspects to the detriment of the best. After all, how can you make the world a better place without treating history as prolouge to the present?

The solution? Human beings have two ears and one mouth for a reason... and if I offered a solution, it would presume that I had one. Which I don't. But I'd be more than happy to listen to yours.

Thursday, April 03, 2008

NYT: Tighten Your Belt, Strengthen Your Mind - New York Times

So much for the concept of a sugar high:
What limits willpower? Some have suggested that it is blood sugar, which brain cells use as their main energy source and cannot do without for even a few minutes. Most cognitive functions are unaffected by minor blood sugar fluctuations over the course of a day, but planning and self-control are sensitive to such small changes. Exerting self-control lowers blood sugar, which reduces the capacity for further self-control. People who drink a glass of lemonade between completing one task requiring self-control and beginning a second one perform equally well on both tasks, while people who drink sugarless diet lemonade make more errors on the second task than on the first. Foods that persistently elevate blood sugar, like those containing protein or complex carbohydrates, might enhance willpower for longer periods.
The point of the article is that human beings essentially have a limited amount of willpower. Consequently, you can increase your willpower simply by exercising it.

Imagine that.

Re-Elect John Hager for RPV Chairman

Yes yes... long expected, but way overdue.

Why now? A little prompting, as Zak Moore over at Roanoke Red Zone questions a Jeff Frederick e-mail claiming endorsements that properly belong to current RPV Chairman John Hager. An honest misstep I'm sure... but not one that sways my decision making process.

When Hager was first elected, an unnamed reporter pulled me to the side and told me RPV just made the best move it had made in years. "John Hager," he told me, "is the hardest working man in politics. You'll see."

It's not the fact that Hager can make the trip from Winchester to Hampton Roads one day, then the next morning you discover he's starting in Roanoke and making his way towards Fairfax. Nor is it his deep contacts and relationships he has built up both inside the Republican Party as well as in Richmond. It's how he does it... that's what's so impressive.

I've had the privilege of working with John Hager. I would accept that privilege again at anytime, under any circumstances. Our staff is excellent (RPV's Executive Director Charlie Judd deserves so much credit for this), our resources the strongest we have seen them in years, and despite the convoluted ways Virginia Republicans seem to run our state elections, I'm confident those disconnects will continue to dissolve under Chairman John Hager.

Before 2007, I would have shared many of the complaints about RPV that any unit chairman or state-level candidate would have shared. While the Republican Senate Leadership Trust, the House Republican Campaign Committee, and the RSLC try to figure out (another story for another day) how best to put our candidates over the top, RPV leadership is making sure our Virginia Republicans are in the best position to win -- despite the personalities, turf wars, or other inside baseball that occurs inside any given operation.

As a conservative, allow me to say this: Hager is with us on every issue we care about, and will go to the mat for conservatives every time. I am convinced after working alongside John Hager that -- if Hager had been given the Republican nomination for Governor in 2001 -- Mark Warner's legacy would have consisted of a very profitable if dubious stint with Rep. Christopher Dodd... and little else.

John Hager has my endorsement for Chairman, because we deserve real leadership in Richmond. Hager is bringing the party together, Hager understands how substance beats style, and Hager knows this party needs to get back to our conservative basics: by helping good Republicans and beating bad Democrats.

That reporter was right. John Hager really is the hardest working man in politics... and RPV deserves a chairman willing to work that hard for us. While I agree with Jeff Frederick on the vast majority of issues, his race for Chairman comes two years too late. Nothing further needs to be said.

I'm proud to have the opportunity to vote John Hager as RPV Chairman at the State Convention in May, and if you are going to be a delegate this year, I urge you to do the same.

Wednesday, April 02, 2008

Politico: Can You Blame the Guy?

Frankly, Obama did the right thing.

I miss CR UVA

The Red Stater needs to come back.

 

RedStormPAC

$

JEFFERSONIAD POLL: Whom do you support for Virginia Attorney General?

1) John Brownlee
2) Ken Cuccinelli

View Results

About

ShaunKenney.com is one of Virginia's oldest political blogs, focusing on the role of religion and politics in public life. Shaun Kenney, 30, lives in Fluvanna County, Virginia.

Contact

E-mail
RSS/Atom Feed

The Jeffersoniad

 

 


Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites Powered by Blogger


Archives


March 2002
April 2002
May 2002
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
April 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009