Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Welcome To The World, Baby Marie

Heya, folks. Kenney The Younger here. Not to steal Shaun's thunder or anything but I know a good bunch of you all are eagerly awaiting a follow-up on Shaun's last post so I thought I'd come in here late and let the world know that Marie Grace Kenney came into the world Monday night at 6lbs 9oz and 19 inches long. Baby and momma are doing fine and the whole happy family unit should be home sometime this evening.

It's good to have another young'un to brainwash into thinking I'm the Best Uncle In The World.

Monday, November 27, 2006

Contractions?

Looks like it's D-Day... contractions are about 10-12 minutes apart, and we're getting ready to head up the road to Mary Washington.

If I don't post for three days, you'll know the little one has arrived.

Acton: Good News for the Moralists

Now this is interesting, from the Acton Institute PowerBlog:
Here’s some good news for those who prefer to combat cultural evil through the edification and cultivation of moral sensibilities: In “Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets,” Alvin E. Roth finds that “distaste for certain kinds of transactions is a real constraint, every bit as real as the constraints imposed by technology or by the requirements of incentives and efficiency.”

He also finds that “while repugnance can change over time, change can be quite slow.” This presumably applies to the decrease of a sense of repugnance over a currently outlawed activity, as well as the increase in repugnance to a currently practiced pursuit.

This means, though, that not only is patience required, but also that church leaders need to get their positions right before they have a chance of influencing culture for the better. This also means, in part, not calling evil good and good evil as false prophets do.
In short, moral indignation works.

Unfortunately, the link to the paper only takes you to the abstract... so we'll have to go with Acton's word on this one.

Sunday, November 26, 2006

Barticles: Who Can Speak

Yet another excellent post from Bart Hinkle at the RTD, this time effortlessly destroying the "chickenhawk" argument:
Those who have served in the military have a valuable perspective and should be listened to. But it is nonsense to say that only they should be listened to. For one thing, the Founders went to some lengths to ensure that in the United States the final authority over the military would be civilian. For another, to suggest that only veterans can weigh in on military matters is akin to saying only policemen can weigh in on questions of law enforcement. Just as everyone in a community has a stake in the maintenance of law enforcement, everyone in a nation has a stake in the maintenance of national security.

(What’s more, those flinging the Chickenhawk ad hominem usually are trying to undercut the moral authority of advocates of military force, and thereby implicitly undercut the case for using military power. But they overlook the fact that veterans tend to be more hawkish than average, not less—so the Chickenhawk argument, to the extent that it works, only reinforces the case for military aggression.)
Outstanding. Go read it all.

SLANTblog: Why did Webb Win?

Don't know about the rest of the world, but this Democratic chest-thumping in Virginia (and subsequent doom-and-gloom amongst conservatives) has gotten old.

Why did Jim Webb win? One word: MACACA.

And how did it get out? Not through an incompetent Jim Webb campaign, but through blogs willing to stake their reputation and draw the story out. F.T. Rea ponders:
Was Webb’s remarkable win, owing much to blogs, a fluke? Or, is Virginia’s churning blogosphere, flying by the seat of its pants, the avant-garde of American politics?
Did blogs magnify the "macaca" incident? Of course they did. Was Jim Webb's victory a fluke? You bet.

Consider the alternative: If George Allen had not uttered "macaca", or had it not gone on YouTube for the blogs to promote, Allen conceivably would have cruised to a double-digit victory over paleocon-turned-progressive Jim Webb. Allen would be the shoo-in for the GOP presidential nod, there would be no upheaval at RPV, nor would there be a discussion as to what kind of Virginia Republican Party we want to see for 2007-08.

Instead, the Democrats managed to turn a collection of syllables into a racial epithet. I don't think we'll ever properly know what Allen meant by the word (though like it or not, macaca isn't a nice thing to say and has a meaning), but that single incident in August turned a 20+ lead into a 3- deficit from which the GOP never recovered.

As for the Virginia blogosphere, it's true the Dems did a masterful job of laying out the narrative before the MSM picked up on the story. Ironically, the paid boys at Raising Kaine had little to do with it, but rather Ben Tribbet at Not Larry Sabato was the pin in the grenade. Likewise on the right, we fumbled for a response and relied on dubious opinions from the Allen campaign (mohawk, anyone?) that ultimately panned out to be false.

Thus when Sidharth's video clip was YouTube-d and broadcasted to the world, the Dems had the narrative built, whilst we on the right were still wandering in the weeds of misinformation.

Hence the importance of good netroots co-ordinators to political campaigns and operations.

Quo vadis? Republicans need to wake up after Christmas and realize the sky is not falling down. Yes there are thing we can do to make RPV more responsive, efficient, etc. Yes, we need to start taking blogs and podcasts seriously.

No, Virginia is not turning blue, "purpling", or any sort of nonsense like that. Republicans need to get back to the fusionism of old that made the Reagan Revolution great in the 1980's. Figure out the long pole of the big tent, disagree on the peripherals, but understand that in the end we can disagree so long as we continue to focus on what brings us together.

I could go on my tangent about good government being no substitute for self-government, but that would make this a longer post than I intend this to be (and it's long enough).

Your bottom line? Webb didn't win, Allen lost. And blogs helped.

DSL!

Driving along the back roads of Fluvanna, I came up on beautiful Downtown Kent's Store and saw a gentleman working on the phone box just next to the general store.

There was a sign. "High Speed Internet is Available Now!"

I bailed out of the minivan, walked over to the fella (ran was more like it) and asked whether he was installing DSL. Yes, he was installing DSL for the first customer.

I got to be the second, referred another family begging for DSL, and today I am pitching this crappy Sprint Broadband card - which works fine in the city, but terribly out here - and settling in with my new found piece of civilization.

10 acres in the country with DSL rocks!

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Anybody Here Seen My Old Friend John?

22 November 1963, President Jack Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas. Today is the 43rd anniversary.

The Free Lance-Star has a personal account of Lori Deem, who saw Kennedy's procession in Washington on 24 November:
Later Deem and her mother waited in a 40-block line to pass by the casket in the rotunda.

'As they were going by, you could see people's mouths moving,' in silent prayer, Deem said.

And the next day she and her mother returned to Washington to visit Kennedy's new grave at Arlington National Cemetery.

Today Deem wonders how a city could be so silent.

'To me it was amazing,' she said, 'to have all those people and the absence of sound.'
Good article. Meanwhile, timed just for the anniversary of Jack Kennedy's death is new speculation about Senator Robert Kennedy's death from the BBC.

Yes yes... John Kennedy for avid readers of this site is my favorite president, and no I don't dwell on his assassination as some sort of plot. All this having been said, Profiles in Courage should be required reading of anyone wishing to enter public service. Naturally, Virginia's own Thomas Jefferson comes a very close second.

Just as long as he does it OUTSIDE

17-year old Thiago Olson does what very geekish kid wishes they could do with their science lab: build a fusion reactor:
In the basement of his parents' Oakland Township home, tucked away in an area most aren't privy to see, Thiago is exhausting his love of physics on a project that has taken him more than two years and 1,000 hours to research and build -- a large, intricate machine that , on a small scale, creates nuclear fusion.

Nuclear fusion -- when atoms are combined to create energy -- is "kind of like the holy grail of physics," he said.

In fact, on www.fusor.net, the Stoney Creek senior is ranked as the 18th amateur in the world to create nuclear fusion. So, how does he do it?

Pointing to the steel chamber where all the magic happens, Thiago said on Friday that this piece of the puzzle serves as a vacuum. The air is sucked out and into a filter.

Then, deuterium gas -- a form of hydrogen -- is injected into the vacuum. About 40,000 volts of electricity are charged into the chamber from a piece of equipment taken from an old mammogram machine. As the machine runs, the atoms in the chamber are attracted to the center and soon -- ta da -- nuclear fusion.

Thiago said when that happens, a small intense ball of energy forms.

He first achieved fusion in September and has been perfecting the machine he built in his parents' garage ever since.

This year, Thiago was a semifinalist for the Siemens Foundation's National Research Competition. He plans to enter the Science and Engineering Fair of Metropolitan Detroit, which is in March, in hopes of qualifying to be in the Intel International Science and Engineering Fair in New Mexico in May.
What's cooler about this is that he is officially the 18th person in the world to have replicated nuclear fusion.

Monday, November 20, 2006

Merry Thanksgiving!!! OR What Are You Thankful For???

Lowes in Charlottesville, where the Xmas stuff has been up for about two weeks now. I can't possibly be the only one lamenting the loss of Thanksgiving to commercialization...

UPDATE: Mark Gardner has decided to take this to the next level. Post in the comments what you are thankful for this Thanksgiving season!

Reason & Revelation: Yes, Prime Minister

The Friar discusses Yes, Prime Minister and arguments for and against the draft... and press bashing, for that matter.

Sunday, November 19, 2006

QandO: Blogs, campaigns and the 2006 election

Jon Henke, netroots co-ordinator for the George Allen campaign, has posted an excellent analysis of the importance of blogs to elections:
Republicans — both institutionally and during campaigns — will either develop strategies and hire experts to engage the blogosphere quickly and bumpily as happened with the successful Democratic engagement of the blogosphere. . .or they will do so slowly and with great regret that they've effectively ceded to Democrats the most important new political battlefield since talk radio.

Whatever they choose to do, they should be aware that, as effective as the new media has been so far, it's still developing. Republicans are crawling while Democrats are riding bikes... but there is much more than can be done. The Leftosphere has been effective because of Democratic engagement (both official and surrogate) and the unifying effect of minority status. Republicans have a similar chance now. If they accept the existence of the New Media and develop a holistic, long-term strategy, they can still retake the battlefield.

One lesson of 2006, however, is that the blogs are an effective component of the Triangle. Were Democrats not as engaged, they would not have the Senate today; were Republicans more engaged, they would still have the Senate.
There's an additional problem to this. Democrats (and particularly the progressive wing) created their blogosphere mostly from grassroots and activist support. Republicans seem to look behind them to political parties and ask them to counteract the left.

It can't happen that way.

Sure there are things that grasstops can do to help encourage blogs. But when it comes to what Jon Henke consistently called "developing a narrative" for a campaign, the blogs achieve this.

Add this narrative into a fundraising schematic, and you have classic copywriting tactics. Build the narrative, get people invested, make the ask.

Then there's the simple fact of who reads the blogs: reporters, activists, pundits, staff, etc. Not the widest audience, but one that soars in quality.

Republicans in Virginia should take note -- Jason (Kenney the Lesser) has been consistently beating the drum for what he calls a "Redstate Virginia" effort. Jon Henke has also joined the chorus. I know there are a number of us who are plotting to create precisely that, and there are a number of groups trying to circumvent ineptitude (V*CAP's one million conservative voter effort, the Freedom and Prosperity Agenda, Tertium Quids are fine examples).

We gotta break out. More to come, friends.

Nesting...

Woke up this morning to a flurry of cleaning activity. There was dust along the edges of the hallway...

A bag was packed, other times have been meticulously cleaned, and she just ran off to the store to get more "things" to do more cleaning.

Bit early though.

Friday, November 17, 2006

Barticles: Who's Mean Spirited?

A great article from Bart Hinkle over at the Richmond Times-Dispatch on how us free-market types actually give more to charity than socialist types, and the reasons why. Hinkle speculates:
If Brooks’ book is accurate, then it underscores a crucial point: One can both oppose government-mandated charity through social-assistance programs, and demonstrate compassion to an extent greater even than that shown by those who do support such programs.
I love this blog.

Thursday, November 16, 2006

Virginia Virtucon: Lame Duck Nancy

For those who scoffed at the idea that there would be an impending civil war between the liberal and progressive wings of the Democratic Party, the score is Liberals 1, Progressives 0 with the demise of Murtha for House Majority Leader:
This hurts Pelosi even more since not only did she endorse Murtha, but she actively campaigned on his behalf, held meetings and made phone calls. Looks like the House Democrats' rudder will NOT be Speaker Pelosi, but the conservative Blue Dogs.
Of course, this pales in comparison to the impending civil war between libertarians and conservatives... but that's an old saw.

Waldo Jaquith: On the decline of Virginia political blogging.

Dead on:
These days most Virginia political blogs make virtually no effort to persuade anybody to change their minds. A blogger will state his opinion, make no attempt to explain it, and insult those who disagree with them. Telling me I’m stupid does nothing to endear me to your cause. It is not persuasive, so it can have no impact on the political process. It reveals nothing about the blogger — at least, nothing flattering. No attempt is made to educate, so no new facts are gathered by the reader. If anything useful results from this process, I cannot understand what it is.

The result of this is that people take to reading only those blogs that espouse opinions that they already hold, because reading others is such an unpleasant experience. Such bloggers set the tone for the discussions, too, such that rational discourse is impossible. And thus begins the ghettoization of ideological positions and with it the end of the enormous value that once made Virginia political blogs so noteworthy.

I’m grateful that Norm has not bent to these particular winds of change, and continues to write interesting and persuasive blog entries, especially those that challenge my own beliefs, such as today’s piece. He’s one of very few.
I worry about this as well... the blogosphere almost seemed to bring back the days of old where Democrats and Republicans could sit at the Commonwealth Club and discuss issues rather than wage war in the press.

Personally, I think we're closer to that day than before. Still, there are a handful that would tabloid themselves into popularity...

What Happens at State Central.... v2

I've written at length about this phenomenon before.

I direct this at no one, but offer it to folks as a thought.

Given all the back-and-forth about who the next RPV chairman is, I've seen plenty of people reveal information that probably is best kept indoors. Tucker Watkins, Russ Moulton, Ed Gillepsie: then everyone runs and speculates, calling SCC members and haggling them for information.

It's tiresome. And frankly, the Democrats don't deserve to know our dirty laundry.

Now I know why some folks do it. It's popular, it's what folks want to know. For the same reason tabloids print anything on Britney Spears or the very worst expose stories, good stories or "breaking first" attracts readers.

I have two objections:

First, we get back to the orginial problem of every conversation being "blogged" about moments after the conversation is uttered. As I wrote back in March 2005:
RPV's State Central Committee has a tradition of being an egalitarian and spirited meeting where top-level Republicans can speak their minds about the condition and direction of the Republican Party.

Abusing that latitude for political grandstanding is horrific in my opinion.

There's a worse proposition here: Bloggers in general are treated with a bit of contempt. Why? Precisely for this reason. Why should anyone trust me (or bloggers on the whole) if I am just going to run to the ol' blog and post the conversation?

Distasteful, disappointing, and overall a very damaging strike against blogs in Virginia. Some of us just have to grow up.
True, this was in reaction to a "motion by Jim Rich" that never occured, that was posted on Too Conservative as if Rich was there (he was not). All of this to emphasize support for an upcoming district convention.

Yet the idea SCC members cannot feel somewhat secure in divulging information - or worse, divulge information with the specific point of influencing debate - is a strike against what otherwise would be a very commonsense and civil conversation.

Second, why are we airing our dirty laundry to the whole world? Who should get to know the factions within RPV? To what ends? Why do Democrats and others get a free pass into the decision making process at RPV when there are others who have worked lifetimes to sit at the table? Furthermore, what kind of service are we really providing? Are we coarsening the lines of decorum, or is "sunshine at all costs" burning us in the end?

Every member of SCC that I have spoken with save two has mentioned how they don't feel comfortable talking about this stuff because of the blogs. They talk to me because I don't blog about it.

Opinions from others brighter than myself.

Waldo Jaquith:
I'm surprised at how often I see bloggers post about private exchanges, or exchanges that occurred where there was a reasonable belief that no press was present and people felt comfortable speaking accordingly. I would never dare write about these sorts of things. It helps to brand bloggers as unpredictable radicals, rather than as reasonable people who happen to publicly reflect on the events of the day.
Jay Hughes:
Yes, State Central meetings are open to the public. But if I'm interpreting the spirit of Shaun's post (and far be it from me to put words in Shaun's mouth :), I believe he's arguing that bloggers should exercise a degree of restraint regarding posting everything that happens at a certain event. For instance, it isn't always necessary after a meeting or event to race to a computer to post on a blog that Kate Griffin sneezed twice during the proceedings. Also, it's beginning to appear to me that if bloggers are going to "moonlight" as journalists, they should attend in person events upon which they wish to report in order to assure accuracy of reporting.
And a jaded James Young (alluding to the incident which first prompted me to write about this phenomenon):
As someone who also frequently carried proxies to State Central meetings and voted, I agree with you, Shaun, to a point. JD is correct about the legalities; clearly, however, Young Vince was having an acid flashback to his days posing as someone unaffiliated but impressed with Chairman Sean.

Waldo and Jay are exactly correct, too, which I why I respect them. They speak to standards that just about everyone here abides by. Sadly, Vince persists in pursuing his agenda while pretending to behave as a reporter.
What this boils down to is decorum and propriety. When we break the boundaries, journalists either snicker or heap scorn upon blogs as a whole. And rightly so.

LESSON: Not everything you hear deserves to be written about. Your reputation as a person rides on much more, and if you can't be trusted with information, you won't.

Again, this isn't directed at any one person, collection of persons, or anyone at all. It's merely a thought for the future, given with all the goodwill in the world.

Wednesday, November 15, 2006

House Dems Scramble, Fight for Leadership Positions

The war between the liberal and progressive wings of the Democratic Party continues.

I'll be the most interested to see how this rift becomes manifest when Hillary and Obama collide in '08.

Monday, November 13, 2006

Kate Resigns

As any unit chairman will tell you, being chair is a gratifying yet thankless job. It doesn't pay, it is time consuming, and when something goes wrong you get blamed.

To counter that, you get to help good Republicans get elected, you get to know your community even better than before, and to kick it all off you get to work for and with the best people in the world.

From Kate's letter announcing her resignation:
When I became Party Chairman, Lucy, our youngest child, was nine months old. She is turning four on Thanksgiving Day! Our oldest, Henry, is nine. While I have truly loved the opportunity to serve as your chairman, my family has sacrificed mightily. It is time for me to spend more time at home with them.
That had to be tough.

Best wishes to Kate and her family. Regardless of what others may think of Kate's tenure, it wasn't through the best of times.

UPDATE: Some folks who don't have much contact with RPV or State Central are making a lot of assumptions, but most just aren't true. As with most things in life, those who are the most silent probably know the most.

VCAP Conservative Conference

I had a very good time. Moderately attended? Yes. But there were several hundred disciples that will encourage friends to return in 2007. Definitely worth it.

I am just now getting a chance to settle down. The internet connection out here in Fluvanna is terrible on one of these Sprint cards being advertised on TV. For $50, you too can get a blazing fast 153Kb of speed.... and unreliably at best. So it looks like I will be purchasing satellite internet from Hughes or some other firm.

At the moment, I have been spending quite a bit of time outside the home. Fixing up the general store, pruning back my grape vine (which looked even worse since we bought the place six months ago), testing out the chainsaw on a dead birch tree outside, building a burn pile out back, and clearing out my office to paint the ceiling and plaster the 1970's era yellow wood paneling.

The conversation of the VCAP conference was indeed the state of affairs at RPV. No mentions for the chairman, no mentions for the executive director. No mentions even for staff changes, but plenty of recommendations for institutional changes.

Given the moment, I have no thoughts other than to say Kate Griffin inherited the mess that was the Republican Party of Virginia. Lots of criticism her way, but I believe much of it is undeserved. I wish her all the best.

Thursday, November 09, 2006

Senator Coburn on Last Tuesday

Fine words:
The overriding theme of this election, however, is that voters are more interested in changing the culture in Washington than changing course in Washington, D.C. This election was not a rejection of conservative principles per se, but a rejection of corrupt, complacent and incompetent government.
The question remains, will liberal Democrats be the right people to do that?

Time to get Republicans back to basics.

(h/t to Mount Virtus)

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

DenverPost.com: Musgrave win bucked national trend

For those of you keenly interested, we won in Colorado.

Blogging will remain light for the next few days. Glad to see the Marriage Amendment passed in Virginia. Extremely nervous to see that Allen is on the precipice, something I don't think any of us saw going into 2006.

For those interested, I will be moderating a panel at the VCAP Virginia Conservative Convention this Saturday in Richmond. Look forward to seeing everyone there!

 

RedStormPAC

$

JEFFERSONIAD POLL: Whom do you support for Virginia Attorney General?

1) John Brownlee
2) Ken Cuccinelli

View Results

About

ShaunKenney.com is one of Virginia's oldest political blogs, focusing on the role of religion and politics in public life. Shaun Kenney, 30, lives in Fluvanna County, Virginia.

Contact

E-mail
RSS/Atom Feed

The Jeffersoniad

 

 


Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites Powered by Blogger


Archives


March 2002
April 2002
May 2002
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
April 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009