|
|
Wednesday, June 11, 2003Fallout? And so the battle for the hearts and minds of the 28th Virginia Senate district is over, and decidedly in Chichester's favor. So what does this mean, particularly for "conservative Christians" that were the target of the Free Lance-Star editorial last week? As expected, the GOP moderates will capitalize on the victory as more than a repudiation of "negative politics" and extend it to a defeat of the conservative movement altogether. Don't think that will occur? Take this gem of a line for instance: With 61 of 63 precincts reporting, John Chichester has kicked some ass and forgotten names in his primary romp over 'challenger' Mike Rothfeld. Damn right. I'm sorry, Rothfeld fights dirty and Chichester is a good guy. Oh, drats, he doesn't toe the conservative line 100% of the time. You know what? GOOD! I want someone who actually thinks for himself and understands that there's a real world outside of ideals. emphasis added This is the problem. Chichester's absence on parental notification is not going to be one more instance of a politician going MIA when the cards are down, but as statesmanship. Voting to make RU-486 a legal contraceptive is no longer antithecal to pro-life values, it's compassion. Rejecting the Republican promise to rollback the car tax while state expenditures rise 50% over five years is no longer irresponsible, it's construed as "fiscal responsibility." That's not leadership. That's dodging issues that are important to Virginians. Yes yes, the election is over, and any gripes about Chichester's voting record have been settled by the sword so to speak. But this election had nothing to do with a rejection of conservative values. People were turning out to reject negative campaigning and support their old friend. Truth be told, Rothfeld actually ran a very clean campaign. The PACs that were involved certainly didn't, and one can always raise an eyebrow. But the reality is that a canidate has a very limited amount of influence he can exert on independent PACs and what they print. Unfortunately it all gets rolled together. Mike Rothfeld is a good guy and I am proud to support him. The moderates are going to take from this election whatever they choose to take, and since it will be the wrong lessons conservatives can take hope. "Conservative Christians" did not lose yesterday. It was Chichester's entrenchment and the stigma of negative campaigning that won. If anything can be learned, it is the potency of negative politics in both how they are used and how it can be turned against you. Rothfeld's challenge to Chichester was perfectly legitimate. The reasons were clear, our values remained strong. Criticize the style if you wish, but the substance of the argument remains.
|
|
JEFFERSONIAD POLL: Whom do you support for Virginia Attorney General?1) John Brownlee2) Ken Cuccinelli AboutShaunKenney.com is one of Virginia's oldest political blogs, focusing on the role of religion and politics in public life. Shaun Kenney, 30, lives in Fluvanna County, Virginia.ContactThe Jeffersoniad
ArchivesMarch 2002 April 2002 May 2002 June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002 November 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 April 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009
|
|
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Home