|
|
Monday, July 12, 2004US Bishops Refuse Ratzinger's Advice Another splendid job by the USCCB in ignoring Rome once again: During the Denver meeting, the Archbishop of Washington, Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, who heads a committee of bishops set up to look into the issue, read the confidential Ratzinger memorandum to fellow bishops. “It is up to us as bishops in the United States to discern and act on our responsibilities as teachers, pastors and leaders in our nation”, he told them. He said Cardinal Ratzinger “clearly leaves to us as teachers, pastors and leaders whether to pursue this path” of denying the Eucharist to pro-abortion politicians.The Catholic Bishops just don't get it. . . however, there are several bright spots, namely Archbishop Burke of the Archdiocese of St. Louis: Meanwhile Archbishop Burke – who touched off the controversy by declaring that John Kerry could not receive Communion within his archdiocese during the Missouri primary election – has hardened his position since the Denver meeting, writes Richard Major from New York. Burke, who is well known in Rome and is seen as one of the rising stars of the US Church, has written a pastoral letter in which he tells Catholic voters that to support a dissenting politician amounts to “committing a mortal sin”. “Catholics who support such pro- abortion candidates participate in a grave evil,” he says in the pastoral letter. “They must show a change of heart and be sacramentally reconciled or refrain from receiving Holy Communion.”The differnece between McCarrick's position and Burke's is not in reference to the Catholic faithful. There will be no "politicization" of the Eucharist at the communion rail (a rail which in many churches has sadly been dismantled post-1960). The difference is in reference to the pro-abortion leaders these Catholics presumably follow. Pro-abortion Catholic polticians are leaders, and when they lead in a direction opposite their faith, they do something much more notable than someone sitting in the pews who is having a private struggle on the issue. Rather than a private struggle, pro-abortion Catholic politicians lend credibility to the erroneous position that one can be pro-abortion and Catholic - or even worse, be privately anti-abortion and publically pro-choice. Such a position as John Kerry's does something that ordinary lay people's opinions do not; it creates scandal. That is the primary difference between the laity and Catholic politicians. It is an issue that Burke rightly understands and squashes as a good Bishop should, and one that McCarrick understands from the position of the laity, but without a proper understanding of the grave scandal such politicians create.
|
|
JEFFERSONIAD POLL: Whom do you support for Virginia Attorney General?1) John Brownlee2) Ken Cuccinelli AboutShaunKenney.com is one of Virginia's oldest political blogs, focusing on the role of religion and politics in public life. Shaun Kenney, 30, lives in Fluvanna County, Virginia.ContactThe Jeffersoniad
ArchivesMarch 2002 April 2002 May 2002 June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002 November 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 April 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009
|
|
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Home