|
|
Monday, October 04, 2004All or Nothing Councilman Turner and the ACLU I've received a number of kind comments regarding my op-ed castigating the ACLU for prohibiting Councilman Turner from mentioning Christ in his prayer before City Council meetings. Thank you all for your kind words, e-mails, and the like. I look forward to a genuine debate on the matter. Not surprisingly, the FLS opinion section added it's two cents to the discussion: Commenting on the question of whether Fredericksburg City Councilman Hashmel Turner should be able to say "Jesus Christ" at the end of his periodic invocations at council meetings, as part of an "open door" policy including representatives of various faith groups, City Attorney Kathleen Dooley cautioned: "The problem with inviting people in is deciding who or what's going to be considered a legitimate religion. If you have a religion of me and my seven cats, are you going to tell them they can't speak?"Religion - like so many other things - forms the character of our elected officials. If someone who believes in a religion of "me and my seven cats" gets elected to public office, then that person is free to express their religious beliefs before Council meetings. And why not? Elected officials should be just as free to express their beliefs as anyone else. No one should be asked the check their experiences, beliefs, philosophies, and yes even their religious sentiment at the courthouse door. Now there is a false argument at play regarding "opening the door to all faith groups." It would not be the case that every faith-based organization would be invited to pray before meetings. That's a bit unrealistic. However, among the seven representatives in the horseshoe, each one should be able to express their religious beliefs (or lack thereof) as a part of their prayer. I don't know if there are any Catholics on Fredericksburg City Council - I doubt it - but I would not be offended in the slightest if each and every one of them expressed their religious senitment in turn before Council meetings. And why should I take offense if they did? Again, it's the open society and the public square vs. the closing of the American mind. I disagree strongly that silence is the alternative, because that once again only promotes the antithesis of the public square. All faiths of those at the horseshoe should be able to be expressed without fear of reprisal from the government. That's the great thing about the Free Exercise Clause of the 1st Amendment. Silence only promotes the secular humanism we should ideally be trying to combat. Let Reverend Turner pray!
|
|
JEFFERSONIAD POLL: Whom do you support for Virginia Attorney General?1) John Brownlee2) Ken Cuccinelli AboutShaunKenney.com is one of Virginia's oldest political blogs, focusing on the role of religion and politics in public life. Shaun Kenney, 30, lives in Fluvanna County, Virginia.ContactThe Jeffersoniad
ArchivesMarch 2002 April 2002 May 2002 June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002 November 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 April 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009
|
|
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Home