Monday, October 18, 2004Cell Phones and Polls Could cell phone only users be skewing the polling data? Undoubtedly so. The question on many skeptics' minds is whether or not those who use only cell phones will have different voting patterns this year than those who use traditional land line telephones.This is one of those 1932 Gallup issues. For those of you unfamiliar with the story, Gallup conducted a poll in 1932 to determine who would win the election. The results came in overwhelmingly for Hoover. Alas, FDR carried the election. Why? Those who owned telephones at the time tended to be better off than those who did not. That demographic tends to vote Republican, and so naturally the results came back tipped towards Hoover. If you didn't own a phone, you weren't in Gallups polling universe. Now let's take the 18-30 demographic that uses cell phones as their only phone resource? Do you think they vote Republican or Democratic? Many political consultants agree, however, that since younger voters vote at a lower rate as it is, the wireless-only crowd should not significantly affect this year’s results.Perhaps so, but the article concedes that in 10-15 years it could be a problem. If turnout is high this November, it could provide that 1-2% boost for one particular candidate or another (and in the Republican case, I get the feeling that it would be the other).
|
|
JEFFERSONIAD POLL: Whom do you support for Virginia Attorney General?1) John Brownlee2) Ken Cuccinelli AboutShaunKenney.com is one of Virginia's oldest political blogs, focusing on the role of religion and politics in public life. Shaun Kenney, 30, lives in Fluvanna County, Virginia.ContactThe JeffersoniadArchivesMarch 2002 April 2002 May 2002 June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002 November 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 April 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009
|
|
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Home