|
|
Sunday, October 10, 2004Jacques Derrida dies at 74 Author of Deconstructionist Philosophy French philosopher Jacques Derrida died yesterday at the age of 74: Jacques Derrida, 74, originator of the diabolically difficult school of philosophy known as deconstructionism, died Oct. 9, the office of French President Jacques Chirac announced. French media reports said that the cause was pancreatic cancer and that he died at a Paris hospital.Now I have a problem with this, mostly because I don't believe deconstructionist philosophy to be all that difficult to understand. I disagree with the criticism of the article regarding the so-called complexities of deconstructionism, not to mention the presentation of the opposing sides: Supporters said this insight into the layered meanings and incompleteness of language subverts reason and rationality, stripping centuries of assumptions from words and allowing fresh ideas to emerge.Take the color blue; think of the exact shade you are thinking of at this given moment. Now you, while reading this, could be thinking of a royal blue. Someone else who read this moments before could be thinking of peacock blue, while another could think navy blue. The question is, what did *I* mean when I said "blue"? Deconstructionism offers one the ability to escape our inferences on the matter and focus (somewhat, I know this is generalizing) on what linguistic value the author placed on the word "blue". Now a common criticism is that there are two people interpreting the language at hand - the author and the reader. Who gets to determine what is truly meant? Most issues get resolved by the intellectual integrity of the reader, but much can be resolved by linguistic precision on the part of the author. Unfortunately, with any portion of text being read, there is an instance of transmission, and within that transmission there is quite literally a process of translation. That is where the truth or meaning of an expression is lost (or gained, but imperfectly). The variance of values or definitions within a word is a concept known as polysemy, or that it has many (and contrary to the link, not always similar) definitions. Those varying definitions can radically change what the author is trying to transmit to the reader, and often do. So is the philosophy of Derrida difficult to understand? Not if you understand two basic concepts; (1) that words mean things, and (2) words mean different things to different people. What does this do to truth? In my mind, absolutely nothing. It does shore up a basic premise that there are consistent problems with the transmission of truth between imperfect human beings. Sounds fair? To me it does. For more information on the philosophy of Derrida, click here.
|
|
JEFFERSONIAD POLL: Whom do you support for Virginia Attorney General?1) John Brownlee2) Ken Cuccinelli AboutShaunKenney.com is one of Virginia's oldest political blogs, focusing on the role of religion and politics in public life. Shaun Kenney, 30, lives in Fluvanna County, Virginia.ContactThe Jeffersoniad
ArchivesMarch 2002 April 2002 May 2002 June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002 November 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 April 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009
|
|
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Home