|
|
Sunday, December 19, 2004Sobran the Reluctant Anarchist The slide from conservativism to anarchism Most folks have heard me describe the "libertarian streak" that I claim to hold. In many ways I do, but there are certain aspects that I strongly disagree with. As a Catholic, I'm very much pro-life. I believe in a living wage set by the state, a state that sets the boundaries for fair play among businesses, and a state that feels morally obliged to fight the war on drugs. Suprisingly, it is my staunch stance on the war against drugs that divides me from most libertarians (abortion and living wage standards aside). But there is another aspect that separates me from the libertarians at large. It is the topic of anarchy and the role of the state. Aquinas argued even without the fall of man, a state would still be necessary by virtue of being social creatures. "Anarcho-capitalists" such as Rothbard and Hoppe strongly disagree, arguing as Joseph Sobran does here that the state will always overstep its bounds: Murray died a few years ago without quite having made an anarchist of me. It was left to his brilliant disciple, Hans-Hermann Hoppe, to finish my conversion. Hans argued that no constitution could restrain the state. Once its monopoly of force was granted legitimacy, constitutional limits became mere fictions it could disregard; nobody could have the legal standing to enforce those limits. The state itself would decide, by force, what the constitution meant, steadily ruling in its own favor and increasing its own power. This was true a priori, and American history bore it out.I disagree. Sobran and Rothbard argue this point eloquently, and I can say that I disagree with them on a macro scale. Certainly the length of human history bears this out time and time again. The problem is that proverbial leap from the rule of law to tyrrany is presented as if it happens instantaneously, as if the difference between 1776 and 2004 was the difference between Monday and Tuesday. It is the question of the maintenance of the state that anarchists by nature cannot answer adequately. That maintenance requires the element and proper consideration of time on constitutional governments and social contract theory. Here perhaps is my largest complaint with regards to the Rothbard argument for open-ended capitalism; time. Can Rothbard, Hesse, and Sobran seriously argue that the American experiment was one of tyrrany? Of oppression? Did it happen overnight? That even today, we have descended into something opposite of that which our Founding Fathers represented? True, I could concede that socialism is not a dead political or economic philosophy, and indeed it is held by many conservatives today. Russell Kirk was every bit a social engineer, and the conservativism he presents as a political philosophy is the opposite of what thinkers such as Aquinas, von Mises, or Chesterton would envision as ideal. Is anarchy through capitalism the antidote? If Sobran's Aristotelian background should speak towards anything, one can only think towards the Nicomachean Ethics and be reminded of the postulated virtuous mean between excessive socialism and excessive individualism. This excessive answer to creeping socialism is probably intended as a method of balancing the scales (one could only hope). Aquinas had it right. There is a balance, and it is closer to libertarianism and a minimized - and not merely minimalist - state. A viable state strong enough to protect the public square and the proper ordering of society towards that end is what humanity desires. Is it that hard to acheive? To maintain?
|
|
JEFFERSONIAD POLL: Whom do you support for Virginia Attorney General?1) John Brownlee2) Ken Cuccinelli AboutShaunKenney.com is one of Virginia's oldest political blogs, focusing on the role of religion and politics in public life. Shaun Kenney, 30, lives in Fluvanna County, Virginia.ContactThe Jeffersoniad
ArchivesMarch 2002 April 2002 May 2002 June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002 November 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 April 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009
|
|
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Home