|
|
Thursday, July 07, 2005criesinthenight: The Possibility of Being RightYet another new blog joins the ODBA: criesinthenight, who has a great read on the focus of the First Things article on The New Fusionism between social conservatives and neo-conservatives: At the core of the welfare state is one message: you can't do this for yourself. Social Security is a repudiation of the belief that I can invest my money for retirement better than the government. More, taken collectively, they say that society can't take of their own without the coercive force of the government. This is the effect of social defeatism… the effect of a failure to believe in ourselves.First Things has to be my favorite journal at the moment, and I read Bottum's article with a good deal of interest. The possibility of being right, and the improbable marriage of former liberals turned neo-cons and evangelical Christians is something Bottum looks upon with a degree of hope. A fusion of the ideas of social conservatives with the action of liberals. Who could ask for less? For starters, "paleo-conservatives" - an epithet if I've ever heard one - classical liberals, and libertarians all hold objections to the idea that government needs to be the catalyst for change. Reagan's admonishment that government is the problem, not the solution seems to fall by the wayside. No matter, argues Bottum: The angry isolationist paleoconservatives are probably right—this isn’t conservatism, in several older senses of the word. But so what? Call it the new moralism, if you like. Call it a masked liberalism or a kind of radicalism that has bizarrely seized the American scene. Mutter darkly, if you want, about the shotgun marriage of ex-socialists and modern puritans, the cynical political joining of imperial adventurers with reactionary Catholics and backwoods Evangelicals. These facts still remain: The sense of national purpose regained by forceful response to the attacks of September 11 could help summon the will to halt the slaughter of a million unborn children a year. And the energy of the pro-life fight—the fundamental moral cause of our time—may revitalize belief in the great American experiment.And there you have it. An idea that many Republicans of either the economic or social stripe haven't caught on to yet. Neo-conservatives and social conservatives at their root seek government intervention to set right the wrongs of the world. The question is whether or not this is good, or even desireable? Russell Kirk, imaginably, might argue yes. Nozick certainly would not. von Mises would not. Nor would the vast majority of liberals, socialists, or progressives; though they might certainly admire the means if not the ends. In the end, the stuggle between individual action and social action continues. Objectively, the "American experiment" has always been a testimony to individualism rather than socialism. Why then would a marriage of liberal action and social conservativism be an advance? I suppose this is why I could not call myself a neo-conservative. I simply don't believe in the government as a means for change. Certainly, I am a social conservative. Abortion is a tragedy that needs to end, and it is the intervention of government through Roe v. Wade that allows it to persist. Fair wages should be the obligation of an employer to do business. Speech should in no way be restrained or inhibited - or encouraged by the state for that matter. Religious belief does and should play a role in the public square. Government should ideally be so small that it couldn't possibly infringe upon rights, yet sizeable enough to defend our rights when threatened. The defense of life, liberty, and property are what the Founders and the classical liberals would identify as the prime objectives of American governance. Liberty's propogation shouldn't be at the tip of a sword as the neo-cons would have it, nor should it be through the heavy hand of governance as this "new fusionism" proposes.
|
|
JEFFERSONIAD POLL: Whom do you support for Virginia Attorney General?1) John Brownlee2) Ken Cuccinelli AboutShaunKenney.com is one of Virginia's oldest political blogs, focusing on the role of religion and politics in public life. Shaun Kenney, 30, lives in Fluvanna County, Virginia.ContactThe Jeffersoniad
ArchivesMarch 2002 April 2002 May 2002 June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002 November 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 April 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009
|
|
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Home