Thursday, August 11, 2005

'Intelligent design' revisited

There's been much ballyhoo in the Opinion section of the Free Lance-Star and elsewhere over the debate between Darwinian evolutionary theory, intelligent design, and President Bush's comments in favor of ID in the classroom. Yet for all the heartburn from proponents of evolution who want to keep intelligent design out of the classroom, Phil Dodson rightly mentions that this idea isn't anything new, not to mention that it's been taught in the classroom for centuries:
'Intelligent design' is properly taught in some high schools and at many colleges across the United States. Students encounter 'intelligent design,' or, more correctly, the 'argument from design,' in Philosophy 101. The subject is further discussed in more advanced philosophy of religion courses where students delve into the origin and structure of religious concepts, particularly the so-called 'proofs' for God's existence.

'Intelligent design' is one of those. It was envisioned by philosopher/ theologian Thomas of Aquinas, who lived from 1225 until 1274. The Catholic church conferred sainthood upon him for his advancement of Christianity. Thomas, who adopted much of Aristotle's philosophy and retooled it into Catholic theology, attempted to demonstrate that God exists.
Indeed, though I doubt that St. Thomas Aquinas would have embraced ID as the end-all-be-all. However, the guiding principles are there. While I would disagree with Dodson that ID's only place is in philosophy class, there is a sailent point that philosophy should indeed be taught at the high school level.

Philosophy does indeed bring new questions to light that scientific method can address to some degree. As for the whole evolution vs. intelligent design debate, no teacher or professor worth their salt would exclude either theory. Rather, both should be taught, debated, addressed on their merits and pitfalls, and students should be encouraged to come to their own conclusions.

Otherwise, what are we really doing to the hard sciences if we are merely indoctrinating (either evolution or ID) rather than creating scientists?

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Home

 

RedStormPAC

$

JEFFERSONIAD POLL: Whom do you support for Virginia Attorney General?

1) John Brownlee
2) Ken Cuccinelli

View Results

About

ShaunKenney.com is one of Virginia's oldest political blogs, focusing on the role of religion and politics in public life. Shaun Kenney, 30, lives in Fluvanna County, Virginia.

Contact

E-mail
RSS/Atom Feed

The Jeffersoniad

 

 


Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites Powered by Blogger


Archives


March 2002
April 2002
May 2002
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
April 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009