|
|
Sunday, October 09, 2005The Big YawnSo I caught tonights debate (via CSPAN of course). Nothing taken, nothing gained. I thought the "negative campaigning" pledge asked by Sabato towards the end was a bit too much -- Kaine answered it "correctly" by taking the pledge, while Kilgore stuck to his guns on why Tim Kaine would be a disaster as governor. That means bringing to light reasons why not to vote for Kaine. Positive campaigning = reasons to vote for a candidate. Negative campaigning = reasons not to vote for a candidate. Nasty campaigning = unethical or "under the belt" charges (that can be positive or negative). I really wish those who condemn so-called negative campaigning would understand that the technical names don't necessarily share the connotations of the words positive and negative. There's positive law and negative law... and negative law (thou shall nots) are far more preferable to positive laws (thou shalls). That doesn't mean negative laws are bad and positive laws are good. Same deal with positive and negative campaigning. It's when you go below the belt or beyond the pale (unsubstantiated, unfair, or misleading information) that deserves condemnation. If you're opponent is a tax-hiker, signs a "no tax pledge", or is one way or another on abortion -- that's fair play. If you helped drive the City of Richmond into the ground, oppose the death penalty, raised taxes on hard working Virginians, and support killing the unborn... I have a right to know that as a voter, don't I? As for the Catholic issue, Tim Kaine simply failed. You can't be Catholic and advocate pro-abortion policies. His waffling on the death penalty certainly lacked the conviction he's claimed to hold on the issue (and yes, good Catholics can disagree on the death penalty -- but not on abortion). I will say that Kaine was very much more polished than Kilgore. What Kaine had to say would certainly rile up the Democratic base in Northern Virginia. Kilgore held his ground, and overall didn't perform in a manner that would alienate potential supporters. A draw, but a big yawner, with no big surprises.
|
|
JEFFERSONIAD POLL: Whom do you support for Virginia Attorney General?1) John Brownlee2) Ken Cuccinelli AboutShaunKenney.com is one of Virginia's oldest political blogs, focusing on the role of religion and politics in public life. Shaun Kenney, 30, lives in Fluvanna County, Virginia.ContactThe Jeffersoniad
ArchivesMarch 2002 April 2002 May 2002 June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002 November 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 April 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009
|
|
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Home