Wednesday, January 11, 2006FLS on Kaine, abortion, and CatholicismThis morning's Free Lance-Star goes over Governor-elect Tim Kaine's spirituality. An amazing background without question, Jesuit-influenced and all. Can't help but be impressed by that. So what has my dander up? The equation between the gravity of Catholic teaching on the death penalty and abortion: Kaine pledged that, while his Catholic faith led him to personally oppose abortion and the death penalty, he would uphold the law.First of all, when at any point in time did the Kilgore campaign call Tim Kaine out on abortion? Fact: it didn't. Here's the problem. Tim Kaine may personally disbelieve in abortion and the death penalty. But when the Kilgore campaign attacked Kaine on the death penalty, Kaine's response was that he drew a line between his private beliefs and the way he will govern. This naturally raises eyebrows, not only for the dichotomy concerning Kaine's past on the death penalty, but in Catholic eyes, it raises heckles about his obligations as a Catholic to defend and promote the culture of life. This is not a question of debate or palatability. One cannot be a Catholic and be passive on the issue of abortion. Period. You can compare this to the adjoining FLS article where Attorney General-elect Bob McDonnell is grilled for his support of the death penalty. McDonnell, on the other hand, says he sees no contradictions between his Catholic beliefs and supporting the death penalty.No such treatment for Kaine on the issue of abortion, even though the very same encyclical (Evangelium Vitae for those interested) has this to say on the subject of abortion: Abortion and euthanasia are thus crimes which no human law can claim to legitimize. There is no obligation in conscience to obey such laws; instead there is a grave and clear obligation to oppose them by conscientious objection. From the very beginnings of the Church, the apostolic preaching reminded Christians of their duty to obey legitimately constituted public authorities (cf. Rom 13:1-7; 1 Pet 2:13-14), but at the same time it firmly warned that "we must obey God rather than men" (Acts 5:29). In the Old Testament, precisely in regard to threats against life, we find a significant example of resistance to the unjust command of those in authority. After Pharaoh ordered the killing of all newborn males, the Hebrew midwives refused. "They did not do as the king of Egypt commanded them, but let the male children live" (Ex 1:17). But the ultimate reason for their action should be noted: "the midwives feared God" (ibid. ). It is precisely from obedience to God—to whom alone is due that fear which is acknowledgment of his absolute sovereignty—that the strength and the courage to resist unjust human laws are born. It is the strength and the courage of those prepared even to be imprisoned or put to the sword, in the certainty that this is what makes for "the endurance and faith of the saints" (Rev 13:10).What is happening here is issue of dissent over the death penalty (which is allowed amongst Catholics) is being confused with the issue of dissent over abortion (which is not permitted amongst Catholics). These articles blur the lines in terrible fashion, thus the effort by to turn Kaine's death penalty debacle into a free pass on abortion. Not so slick. What makes this worse is the nominal Catholic who read these articles will simply hold them up as an imprimatur for their dissent with Catholic teaching. Their only problem? Kaine's position of sanctioning abortion still isn't consistent with his professed faith, and has only received the approval of a fawning press and the extreme liberals within the Democratic Party. Time will tell if Governor Kaine has the courage to reconcile the two, and I sincerely hope he does.
|
|
JEFFERSONIAD POLL: Whom do you support for Virginia Attorney General?1) John Brownlee2) Ken Cuccinelli AboutShaunKenney.com is one of Virginia's oldest political blogs, focusing on the role of religion and politics in public life. Shaun Kenney, 30, lives in Fluvanna County, Virginia.ContactThe JeffersoniadArchivesMarch 2002 April 2002 May 2002 June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002 November 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 April 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009
|
|
1 Comments:
In every debate, Kilgore said (with accent): "I support a culture of life. My opponent tells one audience in the SW that he's pro-life and another audience in NOVA that he's pro-choice."
And you can bet that Kilgore sent out literature on this topic to pro-life voters.
Furthermore, the "faith vs oath" debate was more present in the death penalty debate where surrogates (and op-eds) openly questioned Tim Kaine's moral character.
It's fair to say that people thought that was unfair. You may not think it's unfair, but that was the perception.
Post a Comment
Home