Sunday, March 12, 2006Catholic Bishops Drop the Hammer on Pro-Abortion Catholic DemocratsRecently, a group of 55 Catholic Democrats issued a statement entitled "Catholics in Political Life," a manifesto explaining their private committment to upholding Catholic moral values while remaining a member of a party that condones abortion -- something explicitly contrary to their faith. The Catholic Bishops have, in their own turn, clairfied that position and re-emphasized that at the heart of all social justice must be a committment to end abortion: We welcome this (document) and other efforts that seek to examine how Catholic legislators bring together their faith and their policy choices. As the Catholic bishops of the United States said in our June 2004 statement, 'Catholics in Political Life': 'We need to do more to persuade all people that human life is precious and human dignity must be defended. This requires more effective dialogue and engagement with all public officials, especially Catholic public officials. We welcome conversation initiated by political leaders themselves.'Catholic Democrats - Kennedy, Kerry, and Virginia Governor Tim Kaine among them - have some explaining to do. Their actions cause grave scandal to practicing Catholics, and the bishops are paying more and more attention. You cannot be both Catholic and pro-abortion. Recently, Catholic bishops have been using a stronger word to define such a position: heresy. They're right too.
|
|
JEFFERSONIAD POLL: Whom do you support for Virginia Attorney General?1) John Brownlee2) Ken Cuccinelli AboutShaunKenney.com is one of Virginia's oldest political blogs, focusing on the role of religion and politics in public life. Shaun Kenney, 30, lives in Fluvanna County, Virginia.ContactThe JeffersoniadArchivesMarch 2002 April 2002 May 2002 June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002 November 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 April 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009
|
|
14 Comments:
Unfortunately this is the kind of stuff that doesn't get much play up here in Virginia. Not a border state, so it's just not on the radar for us I guess.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09212a.htm
No one should be forced to do anything, that is why God gave us free-will. But if you say you are Catholic, that means you have certain beliefs that you hold dear in your heart.
Most polititians believe that stealing is wrong, or rape is wrong, but obviously the thief or rapest does'nt, yet Kennedy and Kerry don't have any problem putting their beliefs on the thief or rapest on these issues but not the murder of an unborn, the most defenseless of all?
I say excommunicate all so called Polititians who say they are Catholic, when actually they are not true Catholics.
True Catholics believe life begins at conception, and to take that life away is nothing but MURDER, no matter how you slice it!
God writes His laws into all mens hearts, and there are just some things that are wrong (evil, sinful) without even thinking about...
Killing, Stealing, raping, lying, etc. It don't take a rocket scientist to know this. Nor should it take a written law from heretics.
Heretic
"one who dissents from an accepted belief or doctrine"
While the Catholic Theology is quite complex, i must mention that all that is required to be a Catholic is simply the points of the apostle's creed.
I believe in God the Father Almighty Creator of Heaven and earth, And in Jesus Christ, His only Son, our Lord, Who was conceived by the Holy Ghost, born of the Virgin Mary, Suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, dead, and buried, He descended into hell; the third day He rose again from the dead, He ascended into Heaven, and now sits at the right hand of God the Father Almighty, I believe in the Holy Spirit, The Holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints, The forgiveness of sins, life everlasting and politicians who vote just as the church tells them too
Oh right, that’s not in the statement of our faith, ha, my mistake.
If you pay close attention to the Apostle's Creed, you will notice that it SUPPORTS what we have been saying regarding pro-abortion, socialistic politicians.
According to your logic, because the Apostle's Creed doesn't mention it specifically, I can be a syncretist (believing that all religions are equal paths to God), I can be a gnostic, I can believe in reincarnation ... except for one little thing.
The Apostle's Creed states SPECIFICALLY, "I believe in the Holy Spirit, The Holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints ..." This is to say that "I Believe" that all the teachings of the Holy Catholic Church are directed, protected, and maintained by the Holy Spirit. In other words, you SUBMIT to the authority and the teachings of the Holy Catholic Church, regardless of whether it is specifically mentioned in the Creed or not.
As such, the Creed is NOT all that you are bound to. If the Holy Catholic Church says that Catholic Politicians excommunicate themselves by publically supporting, in a political office or other, ANYTHING antithetical to Catholic teaching, then that excommunication is binding here as well as in Heaven. Period. No discussion, no squabbling ... those politicians are de facto OUTSIDE of the Church.
When Politicians advocate Marxist ideals (90% of the Democrat platform) which have been condemned by the Church, when politicians advocate immorality (such as homosexuality, abortion, contraception, etc), and when politicians promote syncretism, naturalism, and modernism, they remove themselves from the Church because they DENY the belief in the Holy Catholic Church, mentioned in the Creed.
In regards to heresy trials … they SHOULD be enacted. While a church court holds no temporal weight in the United States (meaning a convicted heretic in a Catholic Court will see no jail time, fines, etc) such a trial would act as a public condemnation of such actions and send a message to the rest of the Catholic world that such beliefs and actions are completely incompatible with Catholic teaching. You bet we should have heresy trials, if for no other reason than to put an end to the confusion existent in the Church regarding what is ok and what is not.
Talk to me when you've gotten your law degree from a Catholic law school. Until then, talk about what you know and leave the rest to the professionals.
Riley: I was confused on your use of the term heresy; I certainly am not as read as i should be on the subject.
In regards to: "Until then, talk about what you know and leave the rest to the professionals." Famous last words:-)
1) The Apostle's Creed contains the bottom line statements regarding what is required to believe in order to be Catholic, however, as I pointed out, there is an awful LOT beneath each statement in order for the fulness of belief to be present. The Apostle's Creed doesn't say that you have to go to Mass every Sunday, but as a Catholic, you are bound to do such a thing. The Apostle's Creed also doesn't mention that one must NOT receive Holy Communion while in a state of Mortal sin, but to do so is sacrelidge. The Apostle's Creed doesn't mention that a Catholic who becomes a Freemason automatically excommunicates himself, but such is outlined in several papal encyclicals.
There is a plethora of things one must believe which are not properly defined by the Apostle's Creed. Take a good look at Pope Pius IX's Syllabus of Errors http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Pius09/p9syll.htm or Pope Pius X's Oath against Modernism http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Pius10/p10moath.htm or Pope Gregory XVI's encyclical on Liberalism and Religious Indifferentism http://www.ewtn.com/library/ENCYC/G16MIRAR.HTM, or Pope Pius XI's encyclical on Reconstruction of the Social Order (condemning liberalism) http://www.ewtn.com/library/ENCYC/P11QUADR.HTM, or Pope Leo XIII's Encyclical on Socialism (condemning it, and I want you to keep closely in mind that MUCH of the Democrat platform is socialistic) http://www.ewtn.com/library/ENCYC/L13APOST.HTM. These encyclicals are 100% binding on ALL Catholics, and if you deny even one of them, then you deny the "belief in the Holy Catholic Church". When you compare what the Church professes and binds on all of her members and you compare these with the platforms of the Democrat party, you will find very quickly that those platforms are incompatible with the Catholic Church.
You seem like an intelligent person. If you want to be intellectually honest, then become as informed as possible and see for yourself what I just outlined for you.
2) We wouldn't try governors for heresy for carrying out death sentences because the death sentence is not antithetical to the faith. While it may be argued that the death penalty is no longer a just form of punishment (I still go back and forth on this issue), the Church has not outrightly condemned the practice. It HAS, however, condemned the practice of abortion, and all members of the Church are bound to support this condemnation. Personally, I think that an interdict should be called in all areas where a "Catholic" politician is actively supporting the practice of abortion. For instance, do you think that Catholics would vote for Ted Kennedy if they were denied the sacraments because they elected him for his pro-abortion stance?
In light of your Catholic beliefs, how can you reconcile your faith (remember the encyclicals I posted) with the Democrat platform?
Post a Comment
Home