Saturday, June 10, 2006

Is the Miller Comic anti-Semitic?



Webb boosters are claiming this picture is not anti-Semitic? Why?

Blow this picture up, and you can see the Webb campaign traced Harris Miller. Anyone who says this is anti-Semitic is ridiculous.
Is that so?

All you really need to do to see if it was "traced" as Webb boosters claim is transpose the two.

If traced, then there shouldn't be any exaggerating features, such as a big nose... or no chin...



You be the judge.

UPDATE: I never thought I'd see this in political campaigning, but now we seem to have a motive for the attacks on Miller:
The caricature has been "quite upsetting to me and my family, to most of my friends, and to a lot of people across this country, frankly," Miller said.

Webb asked, "What would be my motive?"

"Harris hasn't apologized for distorting my views on affirmative action, I'd kind of like to hear that," Webb added.
I'm stunned and shocked.

I think the question can be genuinely raised: Was the comic an attempt to get back for questioning Webb's position on affirmative action???

UPDATE x2: Webb booster Ben Tribbett tries to coverup the obvious, but you can't warp a picture to try to make it fit...



... and then expect it to fit with the original.



I leave it in the hands of the reader to decide for themselves (and wonder what connection there is between Ben Tribbett and Jim Webb). Ben Tribbett, for those who will recall, was the first Webb booster to attack Miller for his Jewish faith.

Such a co-ordinated attack, and all over Webb's opposition to affirmative action?

7 Comments:

At 3:56 PM, Blogger F.T. Rea said...
The tracing defense is as lame as it gets. At best it’s a straw man.

Cartoons, by their nature are stylized drawings. Caricatures generally exaggerate features and expressions for comic effect. There’s almost always a little bit of meanness in them.

The Webb camp would be smarter to suggest that Miller’s huffing and puffing over a ‘toon brings to mind the Muslim zealots, who called for death the cartoonists who depict The Prophet. Whether the flier itself was ever a smart move, or how the juvenile art and copy on it was supposed to convince an adult to vote for Webb, that’s entirely another story.

As far as what Miller ought to say, in my book “No comment,” works. Or, something like, “I’m more of a Popeye, or Flintstones fan.” Anything but, “Make them stop mocking me!”

I’m starting to suspect both camps are cooperating, behind closed doors, to promote this story. Perhaps they think it’s helping them get attention in a race the public has been ignoring. If that’s true they are playing with matches and I hope they don’t burn down the House of Donkey. I’m much happier watching the Virginia GOP eat itself alive over its intolerance of differences within its ranks.

 

At 9:06 PM, Blogger Karen Duncan said...
f.t. rea is right that cartoons by nature are stylized drawings. And the political parody has a long and venerable history.

Doonsbury creator, Gary Trudeau, has produced parodies of Bill Clinton, George Bush, and even the late writer Hunter Thompson. All have used comic exaggeration of the person's features.

So, if Harris Miller were an important enough and well known enough figure to be caricatured in Doonsbury, would that make Trudeau anti-semitic?

I think not.

However, believing that the portrayal of Jewish features is anti-semitic may say more about the person making the accusation. Might it be a Roschearch test of the attitudes of the viewer who makes the accusation because he thinks there is something wrong with Jewish features?

 

At 11:33 AM, Blogger Michael Snook said...
regardless of whether NLS has distorted the picture, your version of the drawing is clearly too big. Scale it down, try again, then we'll talk.

I think I'll try my own.

 

At 11:58 AM, Blogger Shaun Kenney said...
It's pretty universal that the picture was altered by a Webb booster -- either Ben Tribbett or whomever gave him the pictures.

Unfortunately, the excuses given so far:

- TypePad changed the picture size,
- Wrong pictures,
- Got the pics from the wrong person (which was NLS' site)
- The red comparison was altered,
- The photo was resized (impossible since was attached to the b/w comic,

All of these have been terribly lame excuses.

Now F.T. Rea has a more logical and reasoned explanation -- cartoons are caricatures by design and Miller could have responded in a different manner.

Still, all that having been said, when you take the caricature, the money, the cigar, the three-piece suit... the comic was impolitic at best, anti-Semitic at worst.

I worry more about what this is going to do to the tone of Virginia politics if it's not addressed in a direct and meaningful way. Perhaps I've always had an idea of Virginia politics being an honorable enterprise than most, but then again I was born and have lived in Virginia most all of my life.

"The Virginia Way" doesn't seem to be shining through in this primary, and frankly that scares me.

There's also the additional problem of letting instances like this slide, and by doing so you invite worse. That the Webb campaign's response so far has been "well, Miller hasn't apologized for his comments on Webb's stance on affirmative action" just screams of ideologies I previously assumed to be tossed into the dustbin of history.

Why does a Catholic care? Because when injustice happens to one of us, it happens to all of us -- Catholic, Jewish, African-American, Hispanic, Democrat, Republican, etc.

Dignity of the human person, folks. That's square one.

 

At 12:04 PM, Blogger Shaun Kenney said...
Might it be a Roschearch test of the attitudes of the viewer who makes the accusation because he thinks there is something wrong with Jewish features?

Seeing as my mother is Lebanese, I don't see how this could be unless you're suggesting some sort of self-loathing on my part.

So it's with a bit of a smirk I read from Ben and others Webb fanatics that I am somehow "unqualified" to speak of how people exaggerate features that are arguably my own.

This having been said, I can forgive comments in the heat of a campaign, so there it is.

 

At 10:14 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
I'm not buying the anti-Semitism argument in this case, but something that has been gnawing at me is that, in the age of Abramoff, the phrase "Washington lobbyist" is about to carry the same subliminal ethnic undertones as the term "New York lawyer" did for previous generations. Oy vey!

 

At 3:42 PM, Blogger Windham_County said...
Did you notice that Mr. Miller doesn't have earlobes?

 

Post a Comment

Home

 

RedStormPAC

$

JEFFERSONIAD POLL: Whom do you support for Virginia Attorney General?

1) John Brownlee
2) Ken Cuccinelli

View Results

About

ShaunKenney.com is one of Virginia's oldest political blogs, focusing on the role of religion and politics in public life. Shaun Kenney, 30, lives in Fluvanna County, Virginia.

Contact

E-mail
RSS/Atom Feed

The Jeffersoniad

 

 


Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites Powered by Blogger


Archives


March 2002
April 2002
May 2002
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
April 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009