Wednesday, February 13, 2008Oliver North Slams Establishment ConservativesRealClearPolitics has the scoop on those bashing McCain. After I won the 1994 Republican nomination for a U.S. Senate seat in Virginia, I naively assumed that all in the GOP would pull together behind my conservative candidacy. I clearly don't know much about politics. If I did, I'd be writing this from my U.S. Senate office instead of my home in Virginia's Blue Ridge Mountains. But at the trade school John McCain and I attended in Annapolis, Md., they did teach me how to count. I lost by a narrow margin in a three-way race. Some of those who were with me then are among those who now say they won't support John McCain. After volunteering for George Allen's gubernatorial bid in 1993, it was Ollie North's race in 1994 with pulled me into the Republican Party. The energy, the ideas, and the vision were all there. We built a machine, and Virginia Republicans have been feeding off that carcass for fourteen long years.
|
|
JEFFERSONIAD POLL: Whom do you support for Virginia Attorney General?1) John Brownlee2) Ken Cuccinelli AboutShaunKenney.com is one of Virginia's oldest political blogs, focusing on the role of religion and politics in public life. Shaun Kenney, 30, lives in Fluvanna County, Virginia.ContactThe JeffersoniadArchivesMarch 2002 April 2002 May 2002 June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002 November 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 April 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009
|
|
2 Comments:
Michael Barone's The Almanac of American Politics, 2008, p. 539, says the following of Obama as an Illinois State Senator: "He voted against providing medical care for fetuses who survived abortions." So much for his "universal health care."
For my own blogs, I'm doing rsearch on the relationship between George Soros and his political funding of -- and ideological influence on -- Barack Obama. A Hungarian who emigrated to American and made billions of dollars in finance and currency speculation, Soros, his family, and business asocicates have contributed huge sums to Barack Obama in his senatorial and presidential campaigns. (See the "Obama" financial sections on http://opensecrets.org, especially the "top contributors" segment for 2006 and 2008.)
Soros is the financial "godfather" of Moveon.org, the nation's largest political hate group. He's also a fan of Hamas, the Palestine-centered terrorist group. On Feb. 1, 2008, Moveon.org, an organization that claims 3 million-plus left-leaning members, gave its first endorsement to a presidential candidate: Barack Obama. The vast amount of money that's recently poured into Obama's coffers apparently has come from Moveon-types. Moveon.org members and Soros have been pressuring Obama to take more extreme positions on the economy and the war on terrorism.
My columns on Soros, Moveon, and Obama will begin appearing on Sunday, February 17 at: http://camp2008victorya.blogspot.com.
steve maloney
ambridge, pa
Bush probably wouldn't have won reelection if it wasn't for the War on Terror. Don't get me wrong, we did need at him that time, and we still need someone strong on the war on terror.
We also need someone who will stand up of the conservative principles that founded this country.
We need to have strong borders.
We need to have lower taxes and less government. We need judges to interpret the law, not make the law.
The problem is that the two nominees of both parts are not stalwarts of these causes.
McCain now wants to secure the border first, but he led the fight for 'path to citizenship'. What happens when he secures the border? Is the 'path' back? Or will the rule of law mean something.
He voted against the tax cuts because of helping the 'rich', but now wants to extend them.
He now wants strict judges that won't make the law, but he lead the gang of 14 which blocked many a good judges from getting on the bench.
Of course Obama is openly on the wrong side of all this issues and soooooo many more, and would be a Carter v 2.0 - or worse.
McCain is the clear choice on the War on Terror. Sadly there is little else that he instills confidence in me.
Post a Comment
Home